Thank you very much for this important perspective on the piece. I think you are right to emphasize the Ngakpa tradition in Tibet – a culture just as important as the monastic one. That should be mentioned in the article. However, I'm not sure that I'd say "the overwhelming practitioners who have attained this were non-monastic." Each lineage of Tibetan Buddhism has its monastics and its non-celibate yogis…so it seems right to acknowledge both paths, not one over the other. And even the yogi path seems difficult to incorporate into Western lay life, since it can involve much time spent in retreat. Maybe better to detail the specific cultural differences that set Tibetan practice apart from Western culture, instead of off-setting monastic versus secular life. Thank you for making the distinction.