<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Belief in Climate Change a Religious Belief?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/</link>
	<description>daily blog, videos, e-newsletter &#38; magazine on yoga + organics + green living + non-new agey spirituality + ecofashion + conscious consumerism=it&#039;s about the mindful life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-25509</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elephantjournal.com/?p=31130#comment-25509</guid>
		<description>That makse sense to me ndsmith. 
 
I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. 
 
Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. 
 
Bob Weisenberg 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://YogaDemystified.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://YogaDemystified.com&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makse sense to me ndsmith. </p>
<p>I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. </p>
<p>Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. </p>
<p>Bob Weisenberg<br />
<a href="http://YogaDemystified.com" target="_blank">http://YogaDemystified.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-25511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elephantjournal.com/?p=31130#comment-25511</guid>
		<description>That makse sense to me ndsmith. 
 
I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. 
 
Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. 
 
Bob Weisenberg 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://YogaDemystified.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://YogaDemystified.com&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makse sense to me ndsmith. </p>
<p>I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. </p>
<p>Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. </p>
<p>Bob Weisenberg<br />
<a href="http://YogaDemystified.com" target="_blank">http://YogaDemystified.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-25512</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elephantjournal.com/?p=31130#comment-25512</guid>
		<description>That makse sense to me ndsmith. 
 
I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. 
 
Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. 
 
Bob Weisenberg 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://YogaDemystified.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://YogaDemystified.com&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makse sense to me ndsmith. </p>
<p>I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. </p>
<p>Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. </p>
<p>Bob Weisenberg<br />
<a href="http://YogaDemystified.com" target="_blank">http://YogaDemystified.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-25513</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elephantjournal.com/?p=31130#comment-25513</guid>
		<description>That makse sense to me ndsmith. 
 
I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. 
 
Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. 
 
Bob Weisenberg 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://YogaDemystified.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://YogaDemystified.com&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makse sense to me ndsmith. </p>
<p>I  think &quot;ethical philosophy&quot;, or even better just &quot;ethical believe&quot; is a good choice of words.  It&#039;s what you believe is the proper ethical response to the science.  Everyone has ethical beliefs whether they consider themselves religious/spiritual or not. </p>
<p>Again, it appears on the surface that the law in question above is designed to  take both into account. </p>
<p>Bob Weisenberg<br />
<a href="http://YogaDemystified.com" target="_blank">http://YogaDemystified.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ndsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-25506</link>
		<dc:creator>ndsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elephantjournal.com/?p=31130#comment-25506</guid>
		<description>Bob, that&#039;s my sense too. The connection between science and action makes it more than science. There&#039;s a normative component. People who take climate change seriously feel that the *ought* to do something different about the way they live their lives. Science can&#039;t tell us what we *ought* to do, it can only tell us what *is* the case. 
 
Does it fall in the realm of &quot;philosophy&quot; then? Or are we missing a category for describing that range of beliefs that directly and importantly move us to act in different ways? Should these beliefs all be protected? I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite right to call them religious, or even broadly spiritual. 
 
Clearly, the folks at Freakonomics think that by labeling belief in climate change a &quot;religious&quot; belief, they can be smug about the lack of &quot;rational debate&quot; on that front... 
 
~Nathan Smith (I can&#039;t seem to get intensedebate to recognize anything other than my wordpress login name) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, that&#039;s my sense too. The connection between science and action makes it more than science. There&#039;s a normative component. People who take climate change seriously feel that the *ought* to do something different about the way they live their lives. Science can&#039;t tell us what we *ought* to do, it can only tell us what *is* the case. </p>
<p>Does it fall in the realm of &quot;philosophy&quot; then? Or are we missing a category for describing that range of beliefs that directly and importantly move us to act in different ways? Should these beliefs all be protected? I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite right to call them religious, or even broadly spiritual. </p>
<p>Clearly, the folks at Freakonomics think that by labeling belief in climate change a &quot;religious&quot; belief, they can be smug about the lack of &quot;rational debate&quot; on that front&#8230; </p>
<p>~Nathan Smith (I can&#039;t seem to get intensedebate to recognize anything other than my wordpress login name)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Weisenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.elephantjournal.com/2009/11/is-belief-in-climate-change-a-religious-belief/comment-page-1/#comment-25493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Weisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elephantjournal.com/?p=31130#comment-25493</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s clearly more than just science.  But it&#039;s very clearly not religion either. It&#039;s science and politics and economics and sociology and business, etc., but not religion. 
 
One&#039;s religious beliefs might affect how one responds to climate change.  But that doesn&#039;t make climate change religion any more than refusing medical treatment on religious grounds makes medicine religion. 
 
I have no idea how this affects the logic or sense of the British law, however, which appears to cover more than just religion. 
 
Thanks for the very interesting article. 
 
Bob Weisenberg 
http://Yoga Demystified.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s clearly more than just science.  But it&#039;s very clearly not religion either. It&#039;s science and politics and economics and sociology and business, etc., but not religion. </p>
<p>One&#039;s religious beliefs might affect how one responds to climate change.  But that doesn&#039;t make climate change religion any more than refusing medical treatment on religious grounds makes medicine religion. </p>
<p>I have no idea how this affects the logic or sense of the British law, however, which appears to cover more than just religion. </p>
<p>Thanks for the very interesting article. </p>
<p>Bob Weisenberg<br />
<a href="http://Yoga" rel="nofollow">http://Yoga</a> Demystified.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using wincache
Object Caching 349/352 objects using wincache

Served from: www.elephantjournal.com @ 2012-02-13 05:03:35 -->
