Do you believe the Bible is literally true?

Via Waylon Lewis
on Jan 6, 2012
get elephant's newsletter

The Chaser strikes again.

Takeaway: the Bible needs asterisks, so you can tell what’s old mythology and what should still be enforced. After all, killing adulterers is right by killing homosexuals.

YouTube Preview Image

For West Wing’s (far more eloquent, less funny) take on this, click here.

ed’s note: to be clear, I attended Sunday School and everyone there was amazing. I have nothing but love for religion as long as it’s about love. If it’s about hate…not so much. We have two regular columnists (and many other occasional) who are Christian…you can read Reverend Roger Wolsey’s work here and Scott Robinson’s work here.


About Waylon Lewis

Waylon Lewis, founder of elephant magazine, now & host of Walk the Talk Show with Waylon Lewis, is a 1st generation American Buddhist “Dharma Brat." Voted #1 in U.S. on twitter for #green two years running, Changemaker & Eco Ambassador by Treehugger, Green Hero by Discovery’s Planet Green, Best (!) Shameless Self-Promoter at Westword's Web Awards, Prominent Buddhist by Shambhala Sun, & 100 Most Influential People in Health & Fitness 2011 by "Greatist", Waylon is a mediocre climber, lazy yogi, 365-day bicycle commuter & best friend to Redford (his rescue hound). His aim: to bring the good news re: "the mindful life" beyond the choir & to all those who didn't know they gave a care. | | | | | Google+ For more: publisherelephantjournalcom


13 Responses to “Do you believe the Bible is literally true?”

  1. karlsaliter says:

    Loved it! I practice fundamentalist veganism. Thank God there's no bible for that demographic. As it is, we sometimes get so insufferable, we have to become different people just to get through the day.

  2. yogijulian says:

    even if we acknowledge the metaphorical truth of certain aspects of ancient texts like the bible, and thus liberate it from fundamentalist literalism, we still have to commit the necessary taboo of acknowledging PROGRESS – many of these ideas and beliefs come from a long time ago and are no only incorrect but archaic and brutal.

  3. yogijulian says:

    this is really funny though!

  4. i must admit I love the Aussie approach…..

  5. John Harris says:

    I see…, the argument goes that, the Bible says if a child disobeys his/her parents they need to be put to death (Exodus 21:7 and Leviticus 20:9). Apparently, even Jesus said it in Matthew 15:4. Therefore, if we can’t accept this teaching then why would we accept any other teaching, such as homosexuality being wrong? How does that prove that the Bible cannot be trusted historically?

    Firstly, Jesus did not endorse the killing of a disobedient child. You clip is misleading. He merely used it against the Pharisees, (similar to the way used in this clip). The Pharisees where saying that Jesus’ disciples are not following the law by washing their hands before eating. Jesus answered, if you follow the law so carefully then why don’t you kill your children who have clearly disobey you which is a law written in the Old Testament. Jesus then explained what the law really means. In Matt 15:5-6 He explains that disobeying your parents means that they don’t look after them in their old age. So obviously we are talking about a fully grown person who understands accountability, not a child as portrait in the clip.

    Matthew 15:12 tells us that the Pharisees were offended. This is not a surprise seeing that they were obviously behaving as hypocrites.

    Later on Jesus calls these laws, man-made laws (Matthew 15:9). He accuses them of giving God lip service but their heart is far from him and quotes Isaiah 29:13. Jesus never endorsed it, He simply highlighted their hypocrisies.

    Besides all this, it wasn’t a simply dishonouring of the parents that was the issue; it was much more than that. If a child does dishonour his parents (as described above), then the child is to go on trial before the elders, therefore not simply murdered (Deuteronomy 21:20). It wasn’t the case that the child dishonours his parents and then gets murdered. He is put on trial by the elders for a number of accusations including glutton (being vile) and being a drunkard. This decision is not made by random person walking down the street.

    The clip is using this example to prove the Bible is wrong. This is absurd, because even if we disapprove of a certain command in the Bible, it doesn’t make the Bible wrong; it just shows that we think we are above God’s law. What’s next, should we remove capital punishment for convicted murderers (opposing Numbers 35:30-31), and then claim that the Bible is wrong because we decided to disobey? So we decide something is wrong or right and then use it to attack the Bible because it doesn’t match?

    How are we making these decisions anyway? How are we deciding whether something is right or wrong outside the Bible? Therefore, my obvious question now is this; how do we know it’s wrong to kill a vulgar person who dishonours – or doesn’t look after their parents? Who decides? It is based on majority? Is it based on what the government tells you? HOW DO YOU KNOW?

    Finally, the New Testament is a New Covenant that has in certain instances changed some laws directly such as an eye-for-an-eye (Exodus 21:24; Lev. 24:20; Deut. 19:21 compare with Matthew 5:39). Unfortunately to homosexuals, not only is this not cancelled in the New Testament but has been re-enforced (Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10).

    Finally, regarding the Hunchback or a dwarf along with the disfigured face, deformed limb, defect eye, eczema (inflammation of skin) or scabs or crushed testicles or any other illness etc (Leviticus 21:19-21), it simply says they should not get involved in the offering of food. The Bible does not talk about putting them to death. It’s most likely medical precaution for genetic deformation.

    Get your facts right before attacking Holy Scripture. The Bible is right including Noah's flood. How else would you get layers (it's called hydrologic sorting) or fossils (that requires water, sediments and quick burial). How disappointing that you know so little yet proceed to attack Holy Scripture which is 100% historically accurate!

  6. […] If the Bible is literally true, doesn’t that mean we should do all these things, too? […]

Leave a Reply