F*ck Buddies.

Via on May 10, 2012

 

tweetmeme

 How many times have we heard the term “f*ck buddies” or “friends with benefits”?

On vacation with a friend we spent a lot of time discussing this, mainly trying to decide if it was even conceivable. While exploring Ireland, we found ourselves coming back to this subject on many different occasions.

Our holiday looked like this: airport—pub—hotel—breakfast—old stuff—pub—sleep over a pub—breakfast—pub—oatmeal with Irish Mist (whiskey)—a Texan in a pub—breakfast—pub—looking for Colin Farrell and Jonathon Rhys Meyer…pub, pub, pub. You get the point. In my defense I actually was thinking of Will Ferrell, and was hoping for a glimpse of Henry the VIII.

Needless to say we may have proved two things:

I now believe Guinness to be food group on it’s own, and it may very well be possible to have a friend with benefits. I also now know who Colin Farrell is, I still love the Tudors and I learned a ton about the views of others and sex. All because of Ireland, my friend Elle and a Texan.

I used to waver on my opinion about whether or not having a purely sexual relationship was possible, and when I started considering this as an option—post divorce—I realized there may be something to gain from emotional detachment and physical closeness with someone I absolutely trust. I thought about it long and hard (pun intended) before making an informed decision.

YouTube Preview Image

 

I spoke to both male and female friends, starting on that vacation and continuing after I returned, to get their views on this taboo topic. It turns out my friends are really open about sex.

The majority of my female friends said that they do not think it works because someone always gets hurt. My male friends were all for it. My attention then turned to question who is getting hurt and why? If no one get’s hurt will it work?

It seemed to me this was being done the wrong way.

The women who spoke about the negative aspect of this type of relationship all admitted that they had developed an emotional attachment to their partner leaving them very hurt, and in the end their friendships suffered.

However, the men I spoke to also admitted to developing deeper emotional bonds, admitting that they backed off  so as not to ruin their friendships and at the same time hurt the women.

Both ways the friendship was being effected. And on some level everyone was developing attachment, either emotional or physical or both, to their partner.

Well, duh.

Why weren’t people seeing that this connection is natural and inevitable. Since the fourth century Plato has discussed human societal bonding. We are mammals and we bond with one another through touch. When we have a sexual relationship this creates a coupling—like it or not—for everyone involved.

If going into a situation that mutually benefits two consenting adults, why can’t ground rules be set up?

YouTube Preview Image

 

If you know your friend well enough then you would know if you are considering involvement with someone who is either desperate and clingy, or someone who is emotionally mature enough to understand it’s purely physical foundation. We are open with our friends.

This situation is not for someone you already have feelings for. You are setting yourself up for failure. If you have feelings for someone, be honest. What’s the worst that can happen? They may not feel the same way? You don’t know until you take that step. A key point though no matter which way you look at it though, is a sexual relationship will not create love.

Be realistic. Don’t go into this type of relationship thinking with your heart, or even worse thinking you can change the male friend who never wants to give up his bachelorhood and enjoys playing the field, or the female companion who is not ready for commitment and purposely keeps you in the friend zone. That is when you are going end up pulling something like this:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Remember: it’s not personal, it’s strictly business. The most outspoken of all my male friends was the Texan I met in Ireland (go figure)—no, we were not f*ck buddies. He, like me, does believe in this type of relationship if you set up rules and established boundaries.

Maybe a pros and cons list will help? (The Texan sent me one and I will share with you).

Pros:
> emotional (yes, on some level it’s inevitable—be honest, take it for face value) and physical support
> self confidence (come on, you know you’ll feel sexy—maybe have a bit of swagger in your step).
> stress relief (enough said)
> great exercise (for the main act of intercourse it’s estimated that you can burn up to 200 calories. Add foreplay to that and and you can increase the burn).

Cons:
> the likeliness of one person getting hurt is high (see pro number one)
> in the ideal “friends with benefits” situation both parties know there is no possibility of a long term relationship—that doesn’t mean that one or both participants will not meet someone else they could see themselves with. Ouch all around. Can the other person handle being left out?
> in theory a friendship would be unaffected by this type of thing, but in reality one stands to lose a good friend (if you were close enough to take the f*ck buddy leap, I’m guessing it would suck to lose them on any level).

I was involved in this sort of “relationship” earlier this year and we both fully understood:

> We were not “dating” each other.
> We were not “sexually involved” with other people.
> We did not discuss our relationship with other people, and we were 100% honest with each other.

When we decided to end our involvement, it was the easiest thing ever. No tears, no heartbreak, no drama. We are still friends, we have lunch and talk and we spend time together. Just not alone near a bed.

I fully believe this is type of thing is doable (pun intended), if you have realistic and compatible goals and open communication.

And an occasional Guinness. Cheers.

 


Like elephant journal gets sexy on Facebook.

~

Editor: Kate Bartolotta.

(adapted from my post on  YOGANONYMOUS)

About Jamie Squires

Jamie Squires originally from Mobile, Alabama and lives in Boulder, Colorado. Mother, sister, daughter, friend. Photographer. Yogi. Writer. Living with Lupus and celebrating life after cancer. Lover of the written word. She get the giggles..She is generous with her spirit and laughter. Tends to make excessively long lists. Drinks Irish beer. Hates wearing shoes. Is passionate. Jamie is covered in ink. Loves cheese. It doesn’t interest her what you do for a living, she want to know what your dreams are. You find her portfolio at JamieSquires.com and "like" her on Facebook.

3,039 views

Appreciate this article? Support indie media!

(We use super-secure PayPal - but don't worry - you don't need an account with PayPal.)

9 Responses to “F*ck Buddies.”

  1. guest says:

    thank you, great inside. I tried and found that guys get just as emotionally involved (and sometime expected me to change my mind..) as it is usually described for girls..glad it can work, sad it hasn't for me..

  2. Loved this Jamie. And I think it is "doable." I've had this type of friendship, but usually one person cares more than the other. Making it work where both people truly are okay and not seeking more? I think it can happen. I think it's rare.

    But then maybe that's a good relationship goal like the quote: "love is friendship set on fire." Maybe if we all just focused on respectful friendships with passionate sex, there would be a lot less bullshit and drama. Hallmark would probably go out of business too…

    • Eric says:

      Yeah, I can just see a new Hallmark section in the card store: "Birthday for Friend (with benefits)", or "Get Well Soon, F*ck Buddy!!" :) I concur with Kate. I also think age is a factor, it's easier (generally) for younger people to shag like jackrabbits and remain friends, or not, or something undefined…I've found as I've aged, the emotional stakes are higher. More aware of NOT wanting to harm or be harmed. Ahimsa. But everyone has different needs at different times.

      When I lived in the UK, we didn't eat if we were on the Guinness and referred to it as "liquid pumpernickel"…

  3. Cesare says:

    I think there's a further con that could develop, and that I ended up in, is that the other partner will wildly vacillate from extreme distance to extreme connection, yet all the while maintaining a "friends" situation.

  4. [...] people have collected by the time they hit their mid-30s and you’ll get a pretty good picture of the shadow side that reared its ugly head. Our final communication was via text message and went something like this: Me: Can we please see [...]

  5. Laura Kay says:

    I'm happily polyamorous. Little tip – if you are afraid to spell the word FUCK online, you're probably not ready to do it in real life either. Censorship sucks online and in the bedroom. Set yourself free….

  6. Dana says:

    The world is afraid of commitment…..friends with benefits or fuck buddies is just a fancier word for it. Intimacy is achieved with grace, losing yourself with someone else in complete mind blowing lives in and out of the bedroom. That is liberating and freeing, but until you find that for yourself, experience away with whatever you need to get you to the place where you feel so free and liberated with someone that a buddy is not needed, because you realize you are both just using each other to fill a void that can only be filled with true fly by the seat of your pants love (dirty gritty happy joyful blissful patnership)

  7. [...] may follow the end of a long-term relationship, a short-term affairor even the realization that the one-night stand with the person you actually, secretly, really like is just…. No matter what the circumstance, heartbreak just plain [...]

Leave a Reply