Masters of Deceit? ~ Chris Beal

Via on Aug 9, 2012

“Lineage” does not equal enlightenment.

One way Eastern spiritual traditions are passed on is through written sacred texts. Another important way is through lineage: a master teacher in a given tradition designates one or more of his students as “master” when they are deemed to be ready.

Knowing which students are ready is a delicate matter because spiritual understanding cannot be expressed merely in words; “enlightened” is not so much what one knows as what one is.

A master must sense into the consciousness of their students in order to perceive which ones truly comprehend, not only with their minds but in the essence of their being. When a new “master” in a recognized lineage is designated, students in that lineage can supposedly be confident that he or she can lead them to truth as well as the preceding master.

While many Eastern traditions use a system of lineage to pass on their teachings, I am most familiar with Zen. Although I left Zen practice behind long ago, I still feel there is something sacred about Zen lineage.

Perhaps this is why I’m so annoyed as I increasingly notice how half-baked teachers from other traditions—or perhaps from no tradition—apply the term “Zen Master” to themselves. Even someone who has practiced and taught Zen for years is not a Zen Master, or Roshi in Japanese, unless that person’s own Roshi has designated them as a successor.

Certainly then, someone who has scarcely ever stepped foot in a Zen center is not entitled to this designation.

My own teacher, Adyashanti, comes from Zen, but since he wasn’t appointed by a Roshi, he doesn’t call himself a “Zen Master,” or any other kind of “master,” for that matter.

Still, almost a decade ago now, after a series of awakenings inspired by Adyashanti’s presence, I became moved to research the various American Zen lineages. It seemed—and still does seem—that something incredibly precious was transmitted, and that it didn’t start with my teacher but went back thousands of years.

Maybe it’s this sense of the preciousness of transmission that causes me to feel that it’s a travesty for someone who has only the vaguest familiarity with Zen, or even with Buddhism in some cases, to refer to himself as a “Zen Master.”

Yet even those with a little knowledge of the history of Buddhism in America know that there have been legitimate dharma heirs—successors to the lineage holders in the various traditions, including Zen —who have sometimes behaved in less than enlightened ways.

So if a central purpose of lineage is to help potential students decide if a certain teacher is genuine, maybe it isn’t that helpful a guide.

This brings up the whole question of teachers and their role. In an interview in Dialogues with Emerging Spiritual Teachers, Eckhart Tolle concluded that “teachers who are awake sometimes experience return of their ego because of all of the projection from students.” In other words, when everyone thinks you’re a god, it’s hard not to buy into that view eventually.

Christianity doesn’t have that problem because the earthly manifestation of its god came to earth over 2,000 years ago and never since. But for seekers in Eastern traditions, the teacher often unconsciously represents the inner, unmanifested Buddha that is only consciously realized in awakening. This is natural but also causes much confusion.

In response to the quandary over how to find spiritual leaders of integrity, some communities based in Eastern wisdom have decided to elect their head teacher through democratic process. But this solution also raises some questions.

Given that we don’t know what enlightenment is ahead of time, how is it possible to select the right person to lead us to a goal of which we are ignorant? And how can we choose someone who will not succumb to the egotistic temptation of believing him/herself to be a great master?

I continue to think we in the West need to grapple with this issue until we find the right structures through which the teachings transmitted from the East can flourish.


   Chris Beal lived in Japan for two years, during which she studied and practiced Buddhism, including Zen. She has an M.A. in English and taught at the college level for a 15 years. She now devotes herself to reading and writing about spiritual journeys—especially, but not exclusively, if they take place in Japan. She has recently completed her first novel. Among other sites, her writing appears at  miracleofawakening.blogspot.com, journeystotruth.blogspot.com, and buddhistfictionblog.wordpress.com

 

~

Editor: April Hayes

Like elephant spirituality on Facebook

About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive—and get your name/business/fave non-profit on every page of elephantjournal.com. Questions? info elephantjournal com

641 views

9 Responses to “Masters of Deceit? ~ Chris Beal”

  1. Interesting analysis, Chris. Thanks.

    Bob W. Associate Publisher
    Enjoy Best of elephant journal

  2. ilona says:

    You raise an interesting point; it would be strengthened if backed up with examples of people who call themselves "Zen Masters" who lack the appropriate training.

    • Chris Beal says:

      Yes, it could have. But it might have taken the discussion into a debate about these people, which is not really where I wanted to see it go. It is, important, though, for potential students to be aware that teachers can call themselves anything and not to be too credulous

      • ilona says:

        Fair enough. On a related note, I'm curious if you saw the film "Kumare"? (a fake guru produced real effects in his followers). It's interesting to ponder the idea that belief itself can be the transformational agent.

        • Chris Beal says:

          No, but sounds really interesting. Name sounds Japanese. Do you know the date and/or director of the film? I would be interested to see what kind of "effects" this fake guru produced. From my point of view, it is always the True Self of the teacher meeting the True Self of the student that is the real meeting. So if the "fake" teacher is not in touch with his True Self, what is he transmitting?

          • ilona says:

            The film was released recently. Director (and "fake guru") is Vikram Gandhi. Kumare is an invented name…he stuck an "e" onto the end of his middle name. He (Gandhi) was also interviewed by Colbert. I hope you get a chance to see the movie and that interview (easily found on Google).

          • Chris Beal says:

            Thanks. I'll look for it.

          • Chris Beal says:

            I just saw Kumare. I had written your recommendation down and then forgot about it, but found my note recently. It's out on DVD now. So fascinating. Thanks for telling me about it.

  3. Edward Staskus says:

    I wonder if the old-school Zen master bamboo stick needs to be brought back into play?

Leave a Reply