Why You Should Get Your News from Al Jazeera. ~ Ryan Pinkard

Via elephant journal
on Jul 7, 2012
get elephant's newsletter
Flickr: Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com

CNN, MSNBC, Fox News—your television news network is lying to you.

Or at least they are doing a bad job of informing you.

Last year, during the crisis in Egypt, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton called Al Jazeera “real news,” while criticizing U.S. networks for “losing the information war.” If this statement surprises you then you are not alone.

Launched in 1996, Al Jazeera is an independent broadcaster based in Qatar. Originally in Arabic, Al Jazeera established its English language network in 2006. It has been praised by the Index on Censorship for bringing free information and escaping censorship in the Arab world. I had the privilege to visit the Al Jazeera English headquarters in London last fall. I was taken back and inspired by their professionalism and passion for honest, real journalism.

Americans have a serious negative perception towards the network.

This is due largely to wrongful associations with terrorist videos and Middle Eastern mistrust. The truth is that Al Jazeera is doing a better job at providing in-depth, quality journalism than any U.S. network. Nonetheless, American cable services refuse to carry Al Jazeera for cultural and political reasons.

Following the model of the BBC, CNC and NPR, Al Jazeera is funded mostly by the government of Qatar. This sounds scary, but the government takes a completely hands-off approach. After touring their operations and consuming their content, I am a believer (and so is Hilary). And if you think that American news is more independent than government subsidized news, you are sorely mistaken.

The problem with American media, from CNN to The New York Times, is that at the end of the day they have to make a profit to survive.

This does several damaging things. First, it turns the news into a popularity contest where media pander to what they think viewers want to see, rather than what they should see. Second, do you really trust media from a for-profit corporation more than one transparently funded by taxes? If you do then I suggest you drink an “American beer” like  Budweiser, and watch the film Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism.

Touring their studios, I couldn’t have been more impressed. The diversity of their staff was amazing, including reporters and producers from Europe, Africa, Asia and the Americas. There were several American reporters at Al Jazeera who had left U.S. news outlets fed up.

This diversity is meaningful and symbolic to Al Jazeera’s news coverage.

Unlike xenophobic, celebrity obsessed, Westen-centric media in North America and Europe, Al Jazeera’s mission is to cover the whole world equally and fairly. They have more bureaus in Latin America than CNN and the BBC, and their presence in Africa and Asia is unmatched by Westen news outlets. Al Jazeera covers Western news too, but with a balance that better represents what is actually happening in the world.

Anyone who has taken a media studies course has heard the news value that it takes 1-2 deaths to make news locally, 5-10 deaths to make news nationally, 20-50 deaths to make news internationally, and 50-100 deaths in the developing world to make news at all. That is messed up.

Not only does Al Jazeera report the news, it also has a number of outstanding and award winning series.

People and Power investigates the use and the abuse of power in all corners of the world. In Africa Investigates, local journalists dig deep into shrouded corruption across the continent. Perhaps most meaningful show to what Al Jazeera stands for is Listening Post, which examines and dissects the world’s media—that is, they report on the way news is reported.

Why should you care about the information you consume?

A healthy free press is essential to the function of a democracy and the minds of the people in it. Even if you don’t realize it, news shapes your worldview and can often distort it. As much as reporters may try, no news is truly objective. To own the information you receive, you have to consume it actively, not passively. If you take news like a hypodermic needle and not a conversation, you may be doing it wrong.

Click here to demand Al Jazeera in America, click here to watch a 24-hour live stream of Al Jazeera English until it comes.

Ryan Pinkard is an editorial intern at Elephant Journal. He is a wanderlust backpack journalist in training, and a student at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Find his writing and his images from around the world at ryanpinkard.com. Follow his reviews and exploits on music at milkdrinkscat.tumblr.com.


About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter. Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive—and get your name/business/fave non-profit on every page of elephantjournal.com. Questions? Send to [email protected]


8 Responses to “Why You Should Get Your News from Al Jazeera. ~ Ryan Pinkard”

  1. Mamaste says:

    Just intro'd on FB to: WOW, Enlightened, & Family.

  2. Mark Ledbetter says:

    Thanks. I really like this article for two reasons: It's a real stereotype buster and, for me anyway, new information.

    Course, being who I am, I'd caution against accepting without a little more thought the idea that govt financed news is better. For starters, that possibility exists ONLY when govt is not allowed a monopoly on news.

    But great info all the same. Al Jezeera. Who woulda thought it?

  3. carolhortonbooks says:

    From what I've seen of Al Jazeera, I totally agree with you. I first starting watching some of their coverage online during the Tahrir Square demonstrations in Eqypt. The quality of the journalism was so far superior to what I'm used to in the US (and I basically only consume NPR, the NYTs, etc.), that I started watching more . . . and continued to be impressed.

    It is a travesty that they got tarred as some sort of terrorist news organization in the US – from what I've seen, this is completely untrue; in fact outrageously inaccurate.

  4. Griffin says:

    ” xenophobic, celebrity obsessed, Westen-centric media”

    Those words partially describe why I have stopped watching the news. Thanks for making me aware of another news source.

  5. Brianna says:

    Thanks for the new perspective, Ryan. This is a great article.

  6. sophia grace says:

    Oh how I hear this.

  7. I do like the manner in which you have presented this situation and it really does present me personally some fodder for thought. Anyway, thank you for this exceptional point. Tempe Dentist, Tempe Dental Studio, 4427 South Rural Road Tempe, AZ 85282

  8. sudhir says:

    But every effort to get it English newsletter is meeting dead end. I like it really but all atempts to get newsletter is failing. Please email solution or given answer if you know here itself.