The Connection Between Psychiatric Medications & Violence: Rooting Out the Causes of the Newtown Massacre. ~ Emma Bragdon

Via elephant journal
on Dec 22, 2012
get elephant's newsletter

Source: via Ailesh on Pinterest

What could bring Adam Lanza, a 20-year-old shy man, to act like a monster and then kill himself? Perhaps the side effects of psychiatric medications played a role.

A gunning down of 20 children, a school principal, a school psychologist, four other adults and the murderer’s own mother occurred on Friday, December 14. This is a horrendous crime against humanity. Inhumane.

On December 16, Mark and Louise Tambascio, friends of the shooter’s mother, Nancy Lanza, reported on 60 Minutes that Adam was on medication for psychological problems. They didn’t say what the medication was. It may well have been an anti-depressant, considering he had virtually no social life, was isolating himself and was being home-schooled by his mother.

Every year, reports Joseph Mercola, MD, 230 million prescriptions for antidepressants are filled, making them one of the most-prescribed drugs in the United States.

The repercussions? A review from the Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights International reveals there have been 124,320 Adverse Drug Reactions in connection with antidepressants that have been reported to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (MedWatch), between 2004 and 2011. About a quarter of these adverse reactions came from those aged 19-45. By the FDA’s own admission, only 1-10 percent of side effects are ever reported to the FDA, so the actual number of side effects occurring are most certainly higher than what is reported (multiply 31,000 by 10 or 100 for a more accurate picture and you get 310,000-3,100,000). Side effects listed include: suicidal ideation/behavior (completed suicides, suicide attempts), aggression, hallucinations, self-harm, thoughts of killing others, hostility, physical assault, homicide and violence-related behaviors.

Since 1982, 61 mass murders involving firearms have occurred throughout the country.

Take the red pillWe didn’t have these kinds of school shootings before the proliferation of psychiatric medications. Dig deeply into these stories and you find that most of the murderers were taking psychiatric meds or withdrawing from them (a situation that can cause the same or worse violent impulses). Dr. David Healy, a British psychiatrist, believes psychiatric medications were involved in 90 percent of the school shootings. Healy is a founder of, an independent website for researching and reporting on the effects of prescription drugs.

The Columbine High School shooters were on psychiatric drugs at the time they shot their classmates in 1999. According to the New York Times, at Virginia Tech—where 32 were murdered in 2007—authorities found “prescription medications related to the treatment of psychological problems had been found among Mr. Cho’s effects.” Kip Kinkel was withdrawing from Prozac and had been prescribed Ritalin when he murdered his mother and stepfather and then shot 22 classmates, killing two, in 1998.

An 11-minute film on YouTube dramatically recounts even more stories of the suicides and killings as well as interviews with psychiatrists who speak about FDA approved meds and their connection to violence.  It is not a secret.

Everywhere, there is evidence of a worsening of the mental health of children and teenagers.  In 2001, the US surgeon general, David Satcher, declared the deteriorating mental health of the nation’s children constituted “a health crisis.” Soon after, reports Robert Whitaker, colleges were suddenly wondering who so many of their students were suffering manic episodes or behaving in disturbed ways. A 2007 survey discovered that one in six college students had deliberately “cut or burned self” in the prior year.

On March 22, 2004 the FDA issued a Public Health Advisory that cautioned about the risks associated with the new generation of antidepressants (Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Luvox, Celexa, Lexapro, Wellbutrin, Effexor, Serzone, and Remeron). The warning followed a public hearing at which dozens of family members of victims testified about suicide and violence committed by individuals taking these medications.

Despite the warnings, in 2008 the US Government Accountability Office reported that one in every 15 young adults 18-26 years old is now “seriously mentally ill.”

Add to these statistics the notion of the “spell-binding” effects of psychiatric medications. Dr. Peter Breggin, a Harvard-trained psychiatrist and former full-time consultant to the National Institutes of Mental Health, is writing extensively about this notion. Spell-binding prevents the person taking the drugs from understanding that his behavior and thinking is being dramatically changed by the drugs and leading him to severe deterioration of judgment and bizarre impulses. Some people on the drugs do things, including violent acts, which they would never have done if they had not been on the drugs, writes Breggin. This could explain how a shy young man could turn into a monster.

Adam’s family physician may well have been treating for depression, as it must have been obvious that he was painfully shy and isolating himself. Months before the murders, Adam was also beginning to deliberately burn his own body with a lighter, reported a friend of Nancy Lanza to the New York Daily News. A week before the killing, Nancy Lanza told this friend, “I think I am losing him.” Was Adam also given anti-psychotics by the family doc to stop his self-destructive behavior?

General practitioners do more prescribing of psych meds than psychiatrists—even though they often don’t have the training in psychiatry to effectively manage some of the problems that can arise. Here’s why:

  1.  We learn about drugs through TV ads and then ask our family docs to provide them.
  2.  People don’t like the stigma attached to seeing a psychiatrist.
  3.  Psychiatrists are expensive.
  4.  Young people, like Adam, often prefer not to disclose their inner lives and choose to just take drugs instead.

Any reporter seeking to discover what medications Adam Lanza was taking may find that they cannot get this information; it is protected by patient privilege. If we never see a reference to the drugs prescribed to the shooter, it will be hard to ascertain what impact psychiatric medications had on the massacre on December 14.

Strange, isn’t it, that we check our athletes for “performance enhancement drugs” and youngsters-at-risk, even employees, for “recreational drugs” through blood or urine tests. The results are quickly available. Days have gone by since Adam’s autopsy, December 16. Why don’t we know if Adam’s blood revealed drug use?

News agencies are reluctant to report the connection between psych meds and violence. This is the reason most of us remain ignorant of the connection.

Who stands to gain by withholding this info? The drug manufacturers.

Bad press would detract from what Joseph Mercola, MD, reports is their 80 billion dollar per year profits. Many of these companies have been accused of faulty research and dishonest reporting about the negative side effects of psychiatric medications, especially the impact of combining the drugs together, e.g. an anti-depressant with an anti-psychotic and an anti-anxiety medication taken at different times of the day to manage symptoms and allow for sleep.

Anatomy of an Epidemic, a book that won Robert Whitaker the top prize for investigative journalism in 2010, tells the whole terrible story of how this situation has led to more people and children on disability, straining our welfare system, and proving that more psych meds do not lead to less people on disability.

A November 2011 article in the Wall Street Journal, “Psychiatric Drug Use Spreads,” reports that one in every five American adults is now taking one or more psychiatric drugs according to data collected by pharmacists in a study of two million people. It reported that the use of psychiatric drugs among adults grew 22 percent from 2001 and 2010. Data further reveals that 10 percent of men and 21 percent of adult women now use antidepressants.

It becomes increasingly more important to be aware of the risks of taking these drugs and other options for mental wellness that are less risky and less harmful.

It could well be that Adam Lanza might never have violently gunned down 20 children, six adults, his own mother and himself if he had been given adequate compassionate care by mental health professionals and little or no psychiatric drugs.

We must think deeply together about these facts related to psychiatric medication and act in ways to prevent more killings, giving those with mental disturbance the humane care they need. Considering a very cautious use of psychiatric drugs is an important step. Making sure we know about and manage the effects of psychiatric drugs—and their potential of causing violence—is another step. Making sure people who are emotionally disturbed do not have access to guns is another important step. All three are necessary.

This just might be the answer to ending the massacres…as well as lead us to more humane treatment of those with mental disturbances.

EmmaB&amp_W3Emma Bragdon, PhD is the author of six books offering new options for diagnosing and treating mental disturbances.  Her most recent book, “Resources for Extraordinary Healing: Schizophrenia, Bipolar and Other Serious Mental Illnesses” illumines mental health care in the USA and suggests an integrative form of treatment for body, mind and spirit that takes a cautious approach to all psychiatric drugs.



Ed: Kevin Macku

Like elephant Enlightened Society on Facebook


About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter. Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive—and get your name/business/fave non-profit on every page of Questions? Send to [email protected]


11 Responses to “The Connection Between Psychiatric Medications & Violence: Rooting Out the Causes of the Newtown Massacre. ~ Emma Bragdon”

  1. Vision_Quest2 says:

    I saw these movies, Dead Wrong and Psychiatry, an Industry of Death

    Your points exactly … the drug companies even manufacture illnesses; and there have never been studies to prove mental illness caused by chemical imbalance.

  2. karlsaliter says:

    Thank you, Emma.

  3. Celia Farber says:

    Thank you, thank you, Emma, for daring to invoke the elephant in the room. I have been trying to seed this story in the media for 15 years, since I myself almost committed suicide on a very short course of Prozac, and since I began gathering data. The most devastating database supporting what you are writing about is, whose host is no longer alive, so the cases only go up through 2010.

    I think when you look at, a question mark becomes an exclamation mark pretty quickly, and to my mind anyway, we have the answer: Ban all post-Prozac SSRI meds in youth and children, categorically, and ideally, in all age groups. If they must return to the older anti-depressants, we can live with it, but these new ones have turned about 5% of the 30 million Americans on anti-depressant drugs into potential ticking time bombs. Keep up the brave work.

  4. Mark Ledbetter says:

    I had no idea. If true, this is one of the most important articles I have read in a long time. Thanks.

  5. Jacob Morgan says:

    This article is enlightening.

    Besides the UT Austin sniper, these mass shootings did not use to happen. I did some research, from 1919 to 1934 one could buy a full auto Tommy gun with a 100 round magazine by mail order. Gangsters used them to shoot up cops and other gangsters; no one shot up school yards. From 1930 to 1934 Colt offered the BAR light machine gun for sale to the public–but not one civilian bought one. Up until 1968 one could buy a war surplus m1 carbine with a 30 round magazine by mail order for $20, including postage.

    This isn’t meant to get into the gun control debate. But the point is that back when people could buy machine guns and semi auto rifles via mail order, these incidents did not happen. A ten year old could buy one if they beat their mom to the mailbox. Something else changed, what ever the impact of new gun laws might be, a person with violent delusions is going to hurt someone. A little girl stabbed to death is a tragedy even if it doesn’t make the national news.

    I used to be an EMT and it occured to me that the average EMT understands how the human heart works better than Psychatrists know how the brain works. Where is the hippocratic oath? How can they do no harm if they do not understand what they are doing? Jeez, didn’t electro shock and insulin shock calm patients down also? Makes me wonder if the best time to have had a mental illness in America was during the “moral therapy” Kirkbridge era.

  6. […] men who were drawn to such evil, I can’t help but feel some sympathy and some resonance. They are often described as ostracized loners, deeply introverted individuals struggling with intens… The structures of family, society, and culture which surrounded them did not do enough to cure the […]

  7. Ahaa, its nice discussion on the topic of this
    paragraph at this place at this blog, I have read all that, so now me also commenting
    at this place.

  8. […] check out this piece by Emma Bragdon. Also, check out Thomas Leonard’s correspondence on his […]

  9. Very enlightening! A seminal article not only with regard to mass shootings, but also with respect to the general control-freakish behavior of the drug conglomerates and their consultant psychiatrist lackies towards the population at large. They are trying to control us all sorts of insidiously grotesque and Kafkaesque ways.
    For information about my year long public health campaign on these issues in Edinburgh, Scotland, please visit my website.
    The amazing series of revelations in my Correspondence Section beggars belief.

  10. These issues are also addressed by the Edinburgh Equal Collective Action Forum (EECAF), a support and advocacy organisation for mentally disadvantaged people, on their website


    and they are currently being considered by the Scottish Government at EECAF's request.

  11. These issues are now being addressed by Psychiatric Rights Scotland, a fledging organization run by Andrew Muir, whose wife was repeatedly jagged with severe side effects while suffering from postnatal depression, The group has links with Accountability Scotland and the Scottish Human Rights Commission. In the meantime, Scottish police are declining to investigate a case where Dr. 'Yes' allegedly asked his colleagues to '—away with' some of his patients who were objecting too strongly to the side effects of their psychiatric medications