There is a fairly reliable lipmis test for feminism.  It’s actually so reliable it’s become a meme, a title for a Documentary Film by award winning film maker Cassie Jaye, and the crystiline moment in a movie when the protagonist has to choose between an unpleasant truth and a comfortable misrepresentation.  The Red Pill is this cultural claim, this Documentary and this Matrix moment. But here on earth, how can the regular folk who only need a working level of understanding test Feminism for reliability? For isn’t that what we all crave? Some sort of emotional, cognitive, and trustable coordinate to map out our paths?

I have two perfectly reasonable assessments to test the feminist POV. Here is the second one:

Imagine every living person alive right now. Imagine all the living warm blooded animals too. Imagine the lives of goats, birds, neighbors and perhaps even the cat on your lap. Imagine the lives of trees even. The singular commonality of everything alive today right now is that we had parents who were successful enough to reproduce. Their parents also share this characteristic, as their parents and so on. Back thru time, somehow surviving famines and wars and exposure and disease, maybe even hurricane and volcano. In fact I’m fairly certain of somewhere back in each of our lives, in the ancestry, some guy and gal escaped harm and got to see the day their own child was born. This goes back to a time before we had aposable thumbs and even back before that. The only explanation is evolution. Evolution in biological adaptation and in behavioral adaptation.  Humans found out they had a better survival rate if they devoted more resources and protection for the progeny. This is why salmon have to pump out  thousands each year, they provide practically nothing. We can continue as a species on less that 4 in a whole lifetime. So either oppressive patriarchy is a successful behavioral and biological adaptation or there really never was an oppressive patriarchy. What I find is the latter.  There is, in human Social structures, the same hiararchy as the rest of the family mammalia, and that is gynocentrism. This is why there is Hypergamy, or the competition for reproductive opportunity, and the ever popular Briffaults law, which states that the female determine the reproductive partner and that if no advantage is to be had with a male, no relationship will be made. So the basic premise of Feminism, that there is ( or was) an oppressive patriarchy whereas men benefit from this oppression and that no reasonable compensation is provided, has no attachment to reality.  I have yet to find a single real example of oppressive patriarchy in any warm blooded animal including humans. Every short coming that Feminism bemoans has a social compensation which is reasonable and exposes men ( and boys) to higher harm.  Feminist thinking dehumanizes men and boys and places their lives as disposable and their suffering as irrelevant. It is Misandric and this misandry is inseparable. If you are willing to take the uncomfortable truth and the analogous Red Pill, the uncomfortable part is short lived and a small price to pay for a better understanding. You cannot hate what you understand and everything is understandable.

If you want the other test, simply say this sentence next time you are in a group setting and pay attention to the responses. Here is that sentence:

“Men experience the majority of the miseries life has to offer” the Feminist will disqualify and invalidate the sentence. The truth of the sentence is irrelevant. What matters is the reactions.  That’s the lipmis test for Misandry.