Tattoos = Fashion?

cattoo

Sacred? Or Degraded?

(Or both)

Are Tattoos—once underground, now ubiquitous—sacredly profane or just street cred for yuppies?

Tattoo on the lower back? Might as well be a bullseye. ~ Vince Vaughan, in Wedding Crashers, 2005.

nba tattoos

One thing is clear: tattoos have become fashion. Once the provenance of sailors and military vets, tattoos are now common, and accepted, on sorority girls and NBA players alike. I’ve heard more than once from friends who say “egad, that girl’s tattoo will be weird to look at when she’s a grandma.” But generally we’re aok with tattos. They’re no longer bad boy—they’re downright yuppie. While there are still plenty of amazing tattoo artists, tattoos themselves rarely signify anything deeply meaningful. I can’t tell you how many friends have got one (or ten) because “it looks cool.” And those are the ones being honest.

Many of my Buddhist friends get tattoos of their refuge or Bodhisattva names on their biceps or shoulderblades, or heart. “To remind me,” they invariably say, “of my commitment.” I always think, and sometimes say: “If you need reminding—if it ain’t tattooed on the inside of your heart—you shouldn’t have taken said vow in the first place.” I don’t know that I’m right, however: there’s a long tradition in Buddhism of posting reminder notes of waking up to yourself around the house. And that’s essentially what function these Buddhist tattoos seem to serve: reminders to wake up. And that’s a good thing.

This mornin’, in the tub, in the middle of a long New Yorker article, I was surprised to hear underground end-of-the-world author James Kunstler refer to tattoos negatively. Excerpt:

“I’d say an emergency meeting of the G7 is pretty much the front entrance,” Kunstler said. “Although who would have thought Iceland would be the first to go?”

Kunstler saw degeneracy everywhere. Stopping in a pharmacy to drop off a prescription for sleeping pills, he was nearly bowled over in a narrow aisle by a heavyset woman, and remarked, “Our fellow-Americans just don’t look that healthy.” The tattooed arms of a young man standing next to a young woman at a crosswalk qualified him as a “bad boyfriend.” (The proliferation of tattoos, Kunstler has written, is “a symptom of the growing barbarism in American life,” and the fact that tattoo parlors now rent space on main thoroughfares, like Saratoga Springs’ Broadway, rather than in back alleys, is “a harbinger of social dysfunction.”)

Kunstler showed me a motel at the corner of Broadway and Division Street, near the outdoor cafÈ, that he considered “the most low-quality Western-civilization architecture conceivable.” Its name was the Downtowner, although its appearance suggested a Roadsider. “Look at the details,” he said. “Look at those stupid mangy little shutters and those horrible windows, and the horrible steel railings and those ridiculous pilasters. Everything about it is just so cheap. And the thing that amazes me is that this is the stuff that we built in the most confident and flush period of our history, in the sixties, when, you know, we were basically ruling the world!” Farther along, we came across a faux-Georgian bank, which he said was “basically fabricated out of the cheapest shit you could possibly get, stuck onto a brick box. Except it’s not even a brick box. It’s an aluminum-frame box with a brick veneer, meant to visually get across a cartoon idea that this is a plantation house, and therefore a dignified building-you know, with a dignified activity, banking, going on.” Hard as it may be to believe, Saratoga Springs rates comparatively well in Kunstler’s assessment of America’s built environments.

The architectural criticism was inextricably linked to our national predicament, because in Kunstler’s view the American economy since the Second World War has essentially been one of continuous sprawl-building, made possible by cheap (but diminishing) energy sources, and, given what we’ve built, it amounts to “the greatest misallocation of resources in the history of the world.” As long-term infrastructure, McMansion subdivisions and the big-box retailers that service them are only worth the scraps that can be salvaged by scavenging, he contends…for the rest of this worthwhile read, click here.

Click main image to toggle thru.

Galleria broken. Here’s a substitute:




Help spread the love — Share this with your friends.

782 views

StumbleUpon it! Save to Delicious RSS feed RSS feed share on Facebook take me to kirtsy!
Subscribe to our free Top-10-Blogs-of-the-Week Email Newsletter.

If you liked this, you might like these:


This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

6 Responses to “Tattoos = Fashion?”

  1. Ehron A: Whose place is it to judge, either way? My opinion is that this is only a question that a person about to get a tattoo should ask themselves.

    Tom F "street cred for yuppies"

    definitely. come to my neighborhood. [NY] haha

    Waylon Lewis: Ehron. Good point. My answer: because, in my opinion, there's a long sacred proud underground tradition to tattoos. Like any tradition, it deserves some respect, not just appropriation as fad or fashion.

  2. Matt says:

    Tatoos = ouch … 10 years later = WTF was I thinking?

  3. Everett says:

    Tattoos mean different things to different people. Personally, I like the fact that it is a possession that nobody can ever take from me. I could lose my job, my house, my car… I could be homeless, divorced, living on the streets. But I will always have my tattoos. I will take them to my grave.

  4. Andy says:

    Will I be considered more spiritual in my yoga class if I put a big stupid OM symbol with eagle wings across my back?

  5. My ink serves as a little history lesson, or diary of sorts. Each piece reminds me of a certain time in my life, and the lessons I've learned since then, regardless of whether on not I would choose that specific piece of art today.

  6. Rebecca Carlsonjust as americans have commercialized native american sacredness, china is now doing the same to Tibetan ritual and culture. Tibetan dances are now allowed to be held in "social squares", drawing hundres of participants. Monks in ochre robes yield to social temptations like cell phones, leather jackets, smoking, pool and yes, tattoos– ritual meanings? it's a worldview, people. not everyone understands it's meaning at the same depth. it's a spectrum. you can't eradicate the process of this diverging dispersal into mainstream or sub or sacred society any more than you can decontextualize your self from society. just stand true to your own sacred views if that includes tattooing or religious cultural expressions of any sort and that will champion the meaning at that level for others to recognize. (i'm not talking politics of social or cultural submission, here, just ritual)

Leave a Reply