Doonesbury, Calvin & Hobbes: Is God about Anger (Old Testament), or Love (New Testament)?

Via on Sep 7, 2009

doonesbury god

It’s conventional, accepted wisdom that the Old Testament God was, generally, all anger and punishment and smiting. And that the New Testament was all about love, forgiveness, pacificism. True dat?

This Libertarian blog, my fave blog discovery of the week, says hells no.

calvin and hobbes god

About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive. Questions? info elephantjournal com

928 views

Appreciate this article? Support indie media!

(We use super-secure PayPal - but don't worry - you don't need an account with PayPal.)

2 Responses to “Doonesbury, Calvin & Hobbes: Is God about Anger (Old Testament), or Love (New Testament)?”

  1. Of course, all of this presumes that god is even about ….

  2. Natalie Pritchett: quote from awesome woman/article:
    "That truth is in the first chapter, wherein the Creator is referred to as “God”. After Chapter 1, the only “God” mentioned is “Lord God”. Why the change? Weren’t we doing rather well with just “God”. Didn’t we grasp that “God” meant the one love–light–consciousness which created all? The fact that the loving, creative “God” disappeared after Genesis, chapter 1, and an unloving, punishing “Lord God” sprang up to take its place, is highly suspicious to me. I wish I hadn’t resisted the Bible so vehemently because, now, I know that I would have spotted (had I read it), the most glaring contradiction which I cannot imagine how everyone else missed."

Leave a Reply