The complete tweet that inspired this post: “@PQBoulder If the City of Boulder railroads their home size limits, we may have to move. Too bad ego and insecurity play such big roles.”
Is it a case of Big Brother—or good ol’fashioned green common sense—for Boulder to limit the construction huge homes?
Why do we need huge homes? In 1970, only four years before I was born, 1,400 sq ft was America’s national average. My green-renovated Victorian, “Hotelephant,” in downtown Boulder, Colorado, built in 1904, is 2,100 square feet—it feels big, and yet is less than half the size of your average “McMansion.”
Do we need super-sized homes? Why? If you got five dogs, two parrots and a Kennedy-size family, okay. But if not…why don’t you give a go at giving a care about the next seven generations? Hear about this thing called “green?” It’s not just a fad: it’s about living a good life that also happens to be good for others, and our planet. Living a responsible, yet meaningful and fun life. You can do that in 2,100 square feet, I promise you—and studies have shown that, no matter the size of your home, the vast majority of your time is spent in just one or two rooms.
Disagree? Fine. Let me know why in the comments section, below. Always happy to have a dialogue!
Via the Daily Camera:
hot on elephant
Elephant Journal’s Holiday Gift Guide 636 shares A letter to the Anger that refuses to Leave Me. 519 shares Waylon’s favorite Ethical Gifts. 7 shares Join: Elephant’s Winter 2017 Academy. 27 shares Trevor Noah just won my Respect. 2,532 shares December Forecast: Letting Go of 2016 & Leaning into 2017 with Love. 6,133 shares Year of the Fire Rooster 2017: What to Expect. 571 shares How to Say Goodbye to that almost-great Love. 1,455 share For the Women who are Trying to Do & Be Everything to Everyone. 2,956 shares How to Say “F*ck it” to Fear & Anxiety (& Start Living your Life!). 826 shares