Update: Good news! Blake Mycoskie offers “A sincere apology.”
“…So there is no misunderstanding created by this mistake, let me clearly state that both TOMS, and I as the founder, are passionate believers in equal human and civil rights for all. That belief is a core value of the company and of which we are most proud.”
Kudos. I’ll go back to thinking that TOMS is a flawed but inspiring company that is, even with my questions (see below) more responsible…inspiring…just plain better…mindful…elephanty—than 95% of other shoe companies. ~ ed.
Quotes from comments:
“…here I am wearing a pair of Toms. I feel really gross. I don’t want to tell the guy what to believe in, but as a gay guy, I am not going to wear or buy toms anymore until he disconnects himself from one of the biggest bigot anti-gay organizations on earth.”
On the other hand:
“…many people who heavily involved in getting aid to various African communities are the Evangelical Christian crowd. Good causes are good causes.”
“It’s more a matter of not giving money, or in his case, cultural cache to whatever his real plans are. The thought of all these unfortunate, impoverished children are playing a part in some larger missionary agenda so that we and Blake M can think we’re cool reminds me of that french saying, ‘plus ca change …'”
For years, I’ve written rather cautiously (critically, but supportively—TOMS is doing more than most other shoe companies) about how TOMS Shoes gives shoes to children in third world countries (admirable) based on an inspiring one-for-one model that, sadly, isn’t even close to crade-to-cradle. The shoes are made in third world countries, and not fair labor certified (fair labor certification isn’t, to be fair, available for shoes. TOMS claims to inspect the factories closely). Still, hypothetically, you could have children making toxic shoes in unsafe working conditions that are then bought by inspired/duped would-be “first world” conscious consumers, who then enable one of these un-eco, un-vegan (usually), cheaply-built, quick-to-fall-apart pair of shoes to be donated to a shoeless child.
So they’re an inspiring company that doesn’t yet fulfill the promise of its own marketing, but could do so easily in the future. ~ Waylon Lewis
Like Gay Rights? Like Toms Shoes? You got a problem if you believe in supporting “mindful” companies with your hard-earned dollars—conscious consumerism:
Toms Shoes Founder Might Have Different Political Views Than Many People Wearing His Shoes
Vogue-approved Blake Mycoskie, who came up with the idea to donate a pair of shoes to a needy child for every one sold, is apparently a Focus on the Family supporter. That’s an affiliation that’s sure to irk many of the hipster types…
…and, anyone who respects gay rights as civil rights, or a woman’s right to choose what happens to her body.
Focus on the Family wants to go in a more friendly direction? Perhaps Blake is bringing a new pov to that community:
Some rather agressively-titled food for thought: