No Cult, No Anorexia, No Cancer – What did you assume?

Via on Oct 20, 2011

I explain myself a lot.

It’s my own fault, I realize.  I’m sort of thin.  I’m bald(ish).  I have tattoos.  I do yoga.  And (and), I eat a vegan diet. It’s quite a combo.

Some of the explaining is just due to my appearance.  I get a lot of people assuming that I’m significantly ill (usually the assumption is cancer).  I get a lot assuming that I’m very anorectic (yes, I would say that I have some issues and have had since I was in my early teens, but they are relatively under control – I’m just this size).  I get a few (Grandma, you were such a cutie) assuming that I’m in a cult.  And I get some assuming I’m either a Buddhist or Jainist nun.  There is also something going on where, apparently, in some culture(s) this hairstyle means you are, uh, available for sale.  So, I get some odd looks/offers.

Once people notice the diet, on top of the appearance, I get quite a bit of questions about what I eat (Do you eat fish?  No, I’m a vegan.  How about clams?  No.  Scallops? Sigh.) and why I eat it (Is it because you are sick?  Did your doctor tell you to do this?).  And, I get knowing looks of people who see my shape and my plate and assume that it’s all some sort of weird obsessive eating disordered behavior.  Because, after all, why would anyone voluntarily choose that diet?

Clearly, some of this is rather particular to me.  I’m guessing that the number of 45 year old female, bald, tattooed, vegan professors in the U.S. is small.  But, some of it is about how much assuming we do about people based on things like how they look and what they eat.   We are all guilty of it.  And why do we do this?  One reason is cognitive. The world is full of infinite stimuli.  We encounter so many different “things” in each moment of each day that we can only make sense of the world by categorizing.  We start with broad categories like “people,”  “dog,”  “boy.”  Then, in order to respond to units in those categories that we have little direct experience with, we create subcategories based on what we believe are connected traits.  That’s where it starts to get tricky, because the more we do that, the more likely we are to go wrong.

When you meet a person, you know you can say “Hi, I’m ____.  It’s nice to meet you.”  You know you can comment on the weather or on an event that is happening in the area where you both are.  So far, so good.  Maybe you find out another thing about someone, for example that he is a college student.  So, on the assumption that most college students have a major, you feel pretty safe saying, “What are you studying?”  When it goes wrong is when we create more complex connections.  Bald + thin = cancer.  Tattooed + young + punk band t-shirt = angry dirty mean dangerous punk.  Big family + female = conservative and religious.  Bald + thin + vegan = religious belief X.     When we head down that road, we not only make assumptions about people that are not true (possibly offending them greatly), we also prevent ourselves from really getting to know the individual, because we stop attending to the other characteristics and behaviors and only focus on those that confirm our belief.

Assumptions are dangerous things to make, and like all dangerous things to make — bombs, for instance, or strawberry shortcake — if you make even the tiniest mistake you can find yourself in terrible trouble. ~ Lemony Snicket

I’ve talked to people who assert that all vegans are jackasses about their dietary choice, are rude to omnivores, and are fundamentally unhealthy.  That’s a lot of assumption to push past to have a real conversation.   Sure, some vegans are all of those things.  Some are none.  Just like with any individual characteristic, those who possess it are as different from each other as they are from others who do not have that characteristic.

Working on not making such assumptions is tough, because our mind wants to do it.  A quick glance at the coverage of the Occupy Wall Street events makes clear how many assumptions get made, even in the “objective” press, based on appearance and specific behaviors.  Even when we know better and we really try not to make assumptions, it’s not easy (I do it, and I even teach whole sections of classes about it).  But, if we can go beyond it, we open up the opportunity to better communication with those around us, a deeper understanding of the diversity of experience, and an easier time achieving peaceful community (of all scales) relationships.  And, what is wrong with that?  So, the next time you see a bald, sort of thin, tattooed vegan, a bearded young man with piercings, or a young, conservatively-dressed mom of 5, set aside your assumptions and get to know that person.  You might be surprised.

 

About Lorin Arnold

I'm a university professor, not-that-kind-of-doctor, family and gender communication scholar, spouse, vegan (not a real fur), and mother of six.  I'm a little goofy and a little serious, organized and kind of a mess. In my "spare" time, I teach yin and vinyasa yoga and write The VeganAsana - a blog about yoga and green eating/cooking.  I consider the blog, and my work with elephant journal my little effort to ponder yoga and veganism, and how they intersect, in a way that helps me develop understandings of self, provides information for others, and allows me to rock my creative smarty pants.

1,534 views

Appreciate this article? Support indie media!

(We use PayPal but you don't need an account with PayPal.)

Elephriends - Mindful Affiliates

5 Responses to “No Cult, No Anorexia, No Cancer – What did you assume?”

  1. __MikeG__ says:

    Love this and your others posts. I'm becoming a fan and I'm looking forward to your next submission.

  2. sordog1 says:

    I am 10 years older and naturally bald but also almost totally vegan. I get the same violent reactions to my long green smoothie fast. Who knew eating fresh produce and spurning the canned, fried, processed, boxed, manufactured, industrial crap was an outrageous idea? It wasn't outrageous when grandma said "eat your vegetables, dear!" It is a great joy to start from scratch and experience something and see it for myself. Thanks for your article prompting me to consider whether I actually start from scratch and experience people without labels!
    Shiva

  3. guest says:

    I disagree that assumptions are dangerous as Lemony Snicket says. It's natural, it's human. But acting on those assumptions without taking into account that they may be wrong is dangerous. Thank you for the article! (I don't assume "conservative" when I see 6 children, my only thought is "7 billion miracles are enough". I consider that many children irrresponsible. and yet, the result is that I won't have that many children)

  4. Lorin says:

    Hi, Guest! I tried to make that point about natural humanity of making some assumptions, but how it can go awry. We do all do it. It's just how it plays out that can be an issue. As a good example, some people will assume that having six children means that an individual is of a certain political view, or religion. You seem to assume that if someone has six children, all of those children must be biological. Based on those assumptions, other conclusions are reached (i.e. about other beliefs or stances, or about being irresponsible), and the problem compounds itself. While I wouldn't consider Lemony Snicket an expert on human nature (that quote was as much for a little levity as anything), I think assumptions certainly *can* be dangerous, depending on how they impact our interactions with others.

Leave a Reply