Good News for All Californians Endowed with Unalienable Rights.
“Proposition 8 served no purpose, and had no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California,”
Via The Daily What.
The case will now likely head to the Supreme Court. Because it was narrowly passed, it is less likely according to the NY Times’ sources that the Supreme Court would use this opportunity to give GLBTQ community equal rights…but they may narrowly define a step forward nevertheless.
~
The NY Times. Excerpt, click for the full story:~
We covered Prop 8 like crazy back in the day.
And before that, we featured Gay Rights on our cover well before any other mainstream non-gay or civil rights-focused magazine did.
So this comes as a truly happy ending.
Incorrect source, offensive, or found a typo? Or do you want to write for Elephant?
407 viewsIf you liked this, you might like these:

Gay marriage in California okayed by REPUBLICAN…

A Farewell to H8? (Lessons in Democracy and Gay Marriage)

Top 10 Reasons to make Gay Marriage Illegal & 9 Other Inspiring Gay Things.

What more important: Voter’s Rights or The Constitution? [Iowa Supreme Court strikes down Gay Marriage Ban]

Obama vs. Santorum on Abortion.











"Mitt Romney denounced the decision as an attack by unelected judges on traditional marriage."
First of all, it's not an attack on traditional marriage. No one who wants a traditional marriage will be denied one.
The shot at "unelected judges", though, has some merit. Judges ruling in favor of human rights, as in this case, is great. But when judges use their power to promote activist government or to rewrite the Constitution, some mechanism for removal, such as election, is probably desirable.