Bloomberg & The NYC Soda Ban.

Via on Oct 15, 2012

Anyone living in New York City is probably aware of the current soda ban controversy.

A heated debate has been taking place for months.

However, the focus of the debate is not on soda and its potential negative effects. In a nation consumed with fear of becoming a nanny state, this soda ban has become a martyr for personal choice or the fight for your right to drink soda.

In September, the New York Board of Health passed a ban, with a landslide vote, that restaurants and concession stands can only serve sugary drinks in sizes 16 ounces or smaller. This rule targets non-diet soda and sugar-added drinks like, lemonade.

Even though the new rules will not take effect until next year, the Barclays Center, upon its opening over the weekend, is already complying with the edict. The soda ban comes after several other successful health initiatives, mostly aimed at restaurants: eliminating trans-fat and requiring that the calorie count of foods be posted.

At the helm of these bans, is the current mayor Michael Bloomberg.

While there is no doubt that Bloomberg has affected New York City in numerous positive ways, his sanity of late could be questioned. Has anyone been paying attention to some of the words coming out of his mouth lately? In a Today Show interview in June 2012, Bloomberg stated,

“We’re not banning you from getting the stuff. It’s just if you want 32 ounces, the restaurant has to serve it in two glasses. That’s not exactly taking away your freedoms. It’s not something the Founding Fathers fought for.”

Considering that a variant of soda did not arrive in the United States until the 1870’s this statement is, in fact, true. However, if any of our Founding Fathers were alive today, I can’t imagine any of them taking kindly to being told how much soda they could or could not consume.

With the upcoming mayoral election in 2013, it will be interesting to see if Bloomberg’s lead is followed by his successor, assuming that he doesn’t bend the rules for a 4th term, but that’s a whole other article!

 

~

Editor: Elysha Anderson

Like elephant enlightened society on facebook

About Monica Johnson

Monica loves good food, strong drinks, and the St. Louis Cardinals. To connect with Monica visit http://monicajohnson.pressfolios.com, follow her on Twitter: @broccolimojo, or on Instagram: MonicaMarvels

914 views

Appreciate this article? Support indie media!

(We use super-secure PayPal - but don't worry - you don't need an account with PayPal.)

Elephriends - Mindful Partners

190x1902-EJ-clothing

4 Responses to “Bloomberg & The NYC Soda Ban.”

  1. Isaac Bearfield says:

    Ola! Motor Mash,Thanks for the above, I have a 2003 mitsubishi eclipse. Its over 150,000 miles on it. I just forked out 515.00 dollars for new brake pads and roaters. And 50.00 dollars for a oil change and flush. I don’t get paid for another two weeks and the engine light came on 4 days ago. On monday i took it to an Auto Zone and they plugged in something to the inside of my car. Which narrowed it down to 4 things.1. Defective,loose or missing fuel cap2. EVAP canister broke, hose cracked or not connected3. Purge or vent solenoid defective4. Vacuum leak at engineMy fuel cap is not loose or missing and thats all i know. But i need to know how much time do i have to get this fixed as i don’t get paid for another two weeks.Keep up the good work

  2. Monica Johnson Monica Johnson says:

    Issac- 1. This is a spam comment, 2. You meant this post for another article, or 3. You have avery different take on the NYC Soda Ban than I do…..

  3. Good one Bloomberg. No More Soda! …but a venti white chocolate latte from Starbucks is fine. (620 Calories).
    - james at http://www.nycbody.com

Leave a Reply