Pseudo-intellectuals, Haters & Yoga Police… This One’s For You. Then Go Suck It.

Via elephant journal
on Apr 19, 2012
get elephant's newsletter

People who are deeply devoted to their practice, not only restructure their minds, their bodies change as well.

When we look at Michelangelo’s David, do we get upset if our abs don’t look as good as his?

In reference to various, anonymous individuals who have complained about my subject matter being “too bendy and too pretty,” I offer one of the more articulate and eloquent comments I’ve ever seen inspired by my work. Perhaps, a more intellectual way of saying the same thing in my title above.

“Because one cannot legislate the human soul, art has always been about breaking down walls. Because no dogma can limit the human imagination, art has always been a threat to orthodoxy. Censorship is the blunt instrument of the small minded who insist that art should conform to their politically correct strictures. But art that does this has lost the capacity to communicate the numinous, the transcendent, the authentic, essential inspiration at the heart of the impulse to be in the rapture of creative expression. In its place we are left with propaganda—sanitized, inoffensive, de-sexed, non-threatening, bland propaganda.

Like many, I find much to critique in the commercialized media image of yoga as an acrobatic pecking order ruled over by mainly skinny women with mad gymnastic skills, and in the oft unexamined equating of this image with an embodied enlightenment  to which the rest of us should aspire. However, when this critique has as its underpinning a reference to supposed yogic scriptures, quoting of yamas and niyamas, and claims that art which celebrates  the human form, the female form, beauty, grace, athletic ability, and the wonders of nature is somehow anti-spiritual or un-yogic, I think we are in trouble.

When I look at Sturman’s work I see an unbridled, inspired desire to capture the moment, the synergy of nature, athleticism, energy and states of grace. When I hear some the harsh attacks it occasionally evokes I find myself thinking about the history of censorship, religious orthodoxy, the demand that Eve be depicted wearing a fig leaf or that paintings be destroyed that don’t depict the Savior in the church sanctioned way.

But great art should be provocative, it should break down walls, it should invite us into revelation. Great art does not reinforce our safe conventions, politically correct notions, or pet beliefs—it sets fire to them and shows us something else in the light of the flames.”     ~ Julian Walker

 

Like elephant yoga & elephant culture on Facebook.

~

Editor: Kate Bartolotta

 

2,276 views

About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter. Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive—and get your name/business/fave non-profit on every page of elephantjournal.com. Questions? Send to [email protected]

Comments

55 Responses to “Pseudo-intellectuals, Haters & Yoga Police… This One’s For You. Then Go Suck It.”

  1. […] Pseudo-intellectuals, Haters & Yoga Police… This One’s For You. Then Go Suck It. […]

  2. Thaddeus1 says:

    Whether this is anonymous or not, I wouldn't say this is at all a call for censorship, but much more in the line of a critique via an opinion. But regardless, you've successfully silenced this individual's observation without the slightest acknowledgement that she might have a point about our use of language.

  3. Dan says:

    Funny article and comments. Stuntman claims he is being censored because if comments he does not like, yet clearly he is not being censored. None of the detractors have editorial rights on Ele or elsewhere. He then tries to silence his critics (hmmm censor them) using an intellectual elite argument that his work is art and is tgerefore above criticism.

    Regardless, I am not an art critic. I also do not think this work is art. For me the yoga pieces (I am not familiar with all his work and make no comment there) lack relationship. For me his technical work does have merit.. But there is no relationship between subject and the technical work. All models have the same essential background. There is no interpretation of the model, their personality, their essence or soul or lack thereof. The models do not even matter, as they are usually in some degree is silouette. The technique is the center, and it’s generally the same. Nice to look at, absolutely. Picasso-esq in effect, perhaps. But i dont experience soul illumination or interpretation.

  4. more visions.... says:

    the problem is that he is calling it art…..

  5. June T. says:

    NO— people who study art, who spend their life examining images and what they say about a culture and time are not just reflecting themselves. and if we didn't spend the energy to examine what is so readily spit out by the media,—well, what a waste.