Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists?

The Elephant Ecosystem

Every time you read, share, comment or heart you help an article improve its Rating—which helps Readers see important issues & writers win $$$ from Elephant. Learn more.

Views 10
Shares 3.3
Hearts 0.0
Comments 10
Editor's Pick 0.0
Total Ecosystem Rating 0.0
0 Do you love this article? Show the author your support by hearting.
This photo was banned from Facebook (used with permission from Joanne Jackson).

News: German Justice Minister criticizes Facebook’s double standards: German users are struggling to understand why Facebook is quick to ban nudity, but often fails to ban posts that constitute the criminal offense of incitement to hatred. (

Update: a response from Facebook’s policy department. ~ ed.

I have been hearing rumors about Facebook’s policies towards feminist posts for quite a while now.

I will begin by saying that I have been a huge Facebook fan; I met my husband through mutual friends on Facebook, as well as partners for various women-oriented projects over the last few years. But something seems to have shifted lately—nearly everyone I spoke to regarding this article shared the same conflicted sentiment: we have enjoyed Facebook for the connections it has brought us but feel we have been unfairly censored or punished.

Sonya Renee Taylor, the page owner of The Body is Not an Apology, started a petition on last month:

“The Body Is Not An Apology, an international movement focused on radical self-love and body empowerment, account was SUSPENDED from Facebook after posting a photo of an empowered female body and tribal women in Senegal with their breasts visible. We believe this sort of cultural and gender discrimination is absolutely asking women to apologize for their bodies and is unacceptable. We want a stop to the sexist hypocrisy of suspending accounts and deleting non-sexual images posted by women! The Body Is Not An Apology has over 12,500 friends in over 25 countries who share images, articles and affirmations focused on celebrating our bodies and truly embracing self-love. As a community we are outraged by the sexism and hypocrisy of Facebook’s policies!”

What is troubling is that Facebook has allowed certain posts, which are derogatory towards women, to remain on its pages, while penalizing feminists for speaking out against them. Facebook has allowed hyper-sexualized images of women to remain, as well as comments, posts and pages that support rape culture; Soraya Chemaly wrote an excellent article several months ago about Facebook’s misogyny problem.

Rabid Feminist pointed out this particularly “fun” page on Wednesday, even after hundreds of women reported the page and many of the pictures, is still up and running. However, as The Body is Not an Apology’s petition reminds us, Facebook has censored images of:

1. Women who have beat breast cancer, including Joanne Jackson pictured above.

2. Women with children born with birth defects.

3. Women who breastfeed.

Dana Bakdounis

In researching this article, it appears there are many feminist pages, from all over the world, who feel they have been silenced by Facebook.

The uprising of women in the Arab world, a site with more than 60,000 fans from around the world, released a press release November seventh. It seems their five administrators were all reprimanded by Facebook to some degree, varying from a warning, to a 30 day block. All five women were warned they could permanently lose their accounts. They give the following explanation:

“Dana Bakdounes is one the hundreds of women and men who participated in the Uprising of Women in the Arab World campaign, holding a sign expressing the reason why they support this uprising. Dana’s slogan stated: “I am with the uprising of women in the Arab world because for 20 years I wasn’t allowed to feel the wind in my hair and on my body,” and her picture showed an unveiled woman carrying her passport with her picture when she was veiled.

Dana’s picture was initially posted on October 21, among many other photos and statements of women and men of various religious beliefs and practices (some women were veiled, some unveiled, some in niqab…), all demanding women’s rights and equally enjoying the freedom of speech, in a secular space that promotes tolerance and embraces the differences. But on October 25, Facebook chose to censor Dana’s image and to suspend for 24 hours the account of the admin who posted it. This incident provoked an outrage among the defenders of freedom of speech who started sharing Dana’s picture all over Facebook, Twitter and other media channels.” 

It is difficult to understand what Facebook’s policies are exactly; it seems that the blocking has something to do with Facebook users reporting something they find offensive. While this can be helpful in some ways, the rules don’t seem to apply the same way towards all pages—and there does not seem to be much in the way of examining whether something actually is offensive, once it is reported as such.

Icelandic feminist, Hildur Lilliendahl, was recently  temporarily blocked from posting content on Facebook, for the fourth time. The blocking began when she started collecting abusive public comments from men about women and/or feminists from around the web. Hildur published these comments on Facebook, in an album called “Men who hate women.

Photo: Páll Hilmarsson (used with permission of Hildur Lilliendahl)

The material Facebook termed “abusive” were screenshots of hateful, misogynist comments. Hildur was  reported for re-posting other people’s comments, most recently resulting in a 30-day block. Facebook warned her that she must “stop violating the community standards of Facebook.” Keep in mind, this was after she re-posted a public status from a man with these kind words about her:

If I ‘accidentally’ ran over Hildur, she is probably the only person on earth that I would back up over and leave the car on top of her with the hand brake on!!!) Put this in your ‘men who hate Hildur’ folder, Hildur Lilliendahl.”

The resulting petition on states; “I want to draw attention to the drawbacks of this platform, the Facebook and how easy it’s “community standards” make it to silence our voices.”

When I confirmed the story with Hildur yesterday, she gave this statement:

“I could have gone around the rules, I could have published the screenshots elsewhere and linked to them on Facebook, but I refuse to be silenced. I will not abide to rules that offend me. Neither will I allow corporate mass media to control my behavior.”

What seems unfair about Facebook’s blocking policies is that it is almost impossible to get in touch with a live person or even defend yourself. Thus, other than comparing stories, it is hard to know what Facebook’s actual policies are and how to best deal with them.

According to Facebook’s community standards page, there are nine types of content that may be deemed offensive and removed: Violence and Threats, Self-Harm, Bullying and Harassment, Hate Speech, Graphic Violence, Nudity and Pornography, Identity and Privacy, Intellectual Property and Phishing and Spam. If that is the case, why are sites such as It’s NOT rape, simply free sex allowed to exist, while women who are fighting back against violence and threats are punished?

Rabid Feminist, a popular feminist page with nearly 12,000 fans, shared a similar story a few weeks ago:

“I was locked out of my account for three days because someone complained that I called him a misogynist and a mansplainer (he was). They also removed an anti-rape poster, which I can only find an outline of a nipple beneath a full blouse. I was unable to get anything from Facebook explaining their actions”

In response, Rabid Feminist has set up a blog separate from their Facebook page, so that they can keep in touch with their fans.

Painting by Elisabeth Slettnes (Image used with permission from the artist)

A girl’s guide to taking over the world has experienced similar censorship on their page, which has more than 150,000 fans. One admin was blocked for sharing this image from my page, The Girl God, because the artwork shows a nipple. In response, A girl’s guide has created a ‘banned by facebook’ section in a gallery on their website, which is worth looking at. Wherein they state:

“Facebook is happy to have images of breasts for the purpose of male entertainment but breastfeeding is obscene and must be removed. The oyster image was deemed so offensive that the admin responsible was banned for seven days for posting it!”

The oyster image, is literally, a picture of an oyster.

Admins from A girl’s guide have been banned for every image posted there—and they still have more to add. One admin is currently on a 30 day ban because of an image that is a parody of a model image, copied by the Jackass Boys.

I have been blocked by Facebook, numerous times, to various degrees. Thankfully, my page has not been shut down yet but I have already formulated a Plan B. I am seeing stories all over Facebook about being blocked for three days or more. I am currently blocked for 60 days from making comments on other pages, although I was not given a specific reason why.

I am also blocked from making friend requests for 30 days.

I have many liberal-minded friends who have been blocked from making friend requests; it begs the question, What is wrong with adding friends? In a world that is becoming increasingly global, where we are coming together more and more on ideas alone, is adding friends so dangerous?

On a sliding scale, I have to say that rape culture scares the shit out of me, whereas adding a few friends seems way down at the bottom of the danger list.

If you are not angry yet, here are a few more pictures to fuel the fire from It’s NOT rape, simply free sex. As of publication, all but three of these pictures were still up, while feminists from around the world worried about the fate of their pages.

I can attest that owning a page takes a great deal of effort. Aside from finding good posts throughout the day, you also must respond to people on your page and delete comments that may be offensive to others to keep it a safe space.

Furthermore, it has been suggested that the Facebook algorism takes people off your feeds if they do not  regularly “like” your posts. Thus, losing control over your page for a few days or up to a month effectively cancels out your previous hard work.

We must create better networks of feminist pages so that we better can support each other; Facebook cannot shut us all down. If one sister page is down, the rest of us must spread the word about the injustice and keep the page going. Words of Women from the Egyptian Revolution was a great example of this after The uprising of women in the Arab world experienced problems; they staged a worldwide online protest on their page.

It is also important to note that there are other social media platforms available and that Facebook may not be the best way to share our message now that they have begun charging to promote posts. One such page, World Wide We, sounds promising:

“A new world is possible! Recent global events have given us a taste of the untapped potential of people coming together in new and exciting ways using social media. The vision of World Wide We (WWWe) is to help further realise that potential by moving beyond Facebook with a website that is designed specifically for people across the world to connect, share and act for positive change, easy to use with fresh, new tools, owned by the people, for the people (i.e. a Community Interest Company… that means no billionaire owners!)”

ZSocial is another: “ZSocial is the social network for  individuals and groups striving to win a better world.

My Digital Notebook is yet another site that is just coming together now—their slogan is, “The New Social Network For Self Expression.”

Obviously, there are many social media platforms available to us; it is important for us, as women, to stay connected, however that may be.

As Adrienne Rich said,

“The connections between and among women are the most feared, the most problematic, and the most potentially transforming force on the planet.“

The censorship of women on Facebook must stop; it is only when we speak up that we will truly know how widespread this problem is and change it. Please share your stories in the comments section below—we need a platform to discuss and change Facebook’s policies as they affect women. Then, we can organize and fight for change.

“Today more than ever we want to say to the world that our voices will not be silenced, not by Facebook, nor by patriarchy, dictatorships, military rule and/or religious extremism. They may be temporarily denied, overlooked, censored or whitewashed, but only to be uttered once again. We will continue to write on the dividing walls of fear, submission and defamation, if not tear them down.”

~ The Uprising of Women in the Arab World



Ed: Bryonie Wise

Like elephant enlightened society on Facebook.

The Elephant Ecosystem

Every time you read, share, comment or heart you help an article improve its Rating—which helps Readers see important issues & writers win $$$ from Elephant. Learn more.

Views 10
Shares 3.3
Hearts 0.0
Comments 10
Editor's Pick 0.0
Total Ecosystem Rating 0.0
0 Do you love this article? Show the author your support by hearting.

Read The Best Articles of January
You voted with your hearts, comments, views, and shares.

Trista Hendren

Trista Hendren is the author of The Girl God. The second book in this series, Mother Earth, will be published in December. You can read more about her project with Elisabeth Slettnes at

You must be logged in to post a comment. Create an account.

anonymous Jul 11, 2013 8:26pm

I was actually banned for writing:
"What is food like on your planet, Adam?"
Facebook deemed this was against their policies, and then banned me again when I posted a screenshot of it.

anonymous May 21, 2013 6:02am

Sometimes I think Facebook takes censorship too far. Some pics, like the one at the top, actually incite very interesting discussions. And important ones, I might add!!

anonymous May 4, 2013 10:37am

I’ve been surfing on-line more than 3 hours today, but I never found any fascinating article like yours. It’s lovely value sufficient for me. Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made just right content as you probably did, the web will likely be much more helpful than ever before.

anonymous May 1, 2013 8:50am

[…] i U.W.A.W, fordi jeg i 20 år ikke har fået lov til at føle vinden i mit hår og på min krop.” Trista Hendren, en af Rapebook-stifterne, fortæller at Facebook fire dage senere, den 25. oktober, valgte at […]

anonymous Apr 2, 2013 4:07pm

'only an outline of a nipple'
fucking died.

anonymous Mar 14, 2013 3:10pm

This an email address for Facebook: [email protected] .
I have sent them an email. We should all send them emails.

anonymous Mar 5, 2013 11:32pm

Shop Ipad Stylus pen at Choose from a large assortment of iPad stylus pens including pink and silver. Buy all the accessories for your iPad today.

anonymous Mar 5, 2013 11:26pm

TABU Design is raising funds for Universal Mini Stand: Your Unusual iphone stand. on Kickstarter! Universal …

anonymous Feb 1, 2013 1:51am

[…] […]

anonymous Jan 31, 2013 2:23pm

[…] […]

anonymous Jan 28, 2013 11:17am

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists? […]

anonymous Jan 25, 2013 7:52pm

I was blocked for two weeks with no explanation for my new (1 week old page) talking about feminism. They also took down the main article I'd written and pinned to the top, analyzing masculinity and violence. Shouldn't this be class action suit stuff?

anonymous Jan 18, 2013 11:41am

Wellcome to porn cams runetki online

anonymous Jan 3, 2013 2:45pm

[…] утверждают, что Facebook – это машина дискриминации женщин. В […]

anonymous Dec 17, 2012 4:24am

[…] though it is not a initial time Facebook has taken a position opposite feminism. There are several examples in that feminist-oriented calm was private while a sexist postings that stirred them were […]

anonymous Dec 13, 2012 3:42pm

As a gay man the biggest bullying I have gotten on fb is from extreme feminist, it still floor's me. I can not even ask one of them a rational question with out verbal gun fire.

anonymous Dec 4, 2012 3:21pm

[…] to the skeptic community. High school girls kill themselves because of cyber-bullying. Facebook refuses to delete photos glorifying rape culture even though they’ll censor, say, tribal women in Senegal or […]

anonymous Nov 28, 2012 3:47pm

[…] […]

anonymous Nov 28, 2012 2:20pm

a spreadsheet? Can I help?

anonymous Nov 27, 2012 10:23pm

Excellent points, well made as always. Thank you Trista. x

anonymous Nov 25, 2012 12:30am

I have done away with Facebook, just was not interested in the crap people posted up on feeds.
It was definitely a waste of my time!

anonymous Nov 22, 2012 5:39pm

[…] censura por parte de Facebook a páginas o publicaciones feministas (o simplemente femeninas). En este artículo de la página de bienestar Elephant Journal se mencionan algunos, y yo he leído sobre […]

anonymous Nov 21, 2012 8:34am

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women – or just Feminists? ( […]

anonymous Nov 20, 2012 6:38pm

[…] Facebook has a bit of a misogyny problem. Trista Hendren has a series at Elephant Journal about Facebook’s anti-feminism, noting that, while Facebook often allows derogatory and sexist posts about women, it […]

anonymous Nov 20, 2012 8:57am


but I did get to the part where the women was banned for posting an arab spring protest picture. I could understand why in theory the top picture was banned. But a woman showing a picture of herself and her passport shouldn't affect anyone's sensibilities. I also don't see anything wrong with collecting hateful comments into an album. Maybe that's unfair to the commenter but honestly that's about as far as you could go to call it wrong. People take things out of context all the time. That's not a ban worthy offense, and honestly I've read a few feminist blogs and they rarely take things out of context. Not to say it doesn't happen but it's pretty darn rare.

    anonymous Nov 20, 2012 9:06am

    to be fair I probably would ban the pictures of nudity and the vagina cupcakes and the like if I were facebook. But I would also shut down all these "pro-rape" (I think it's weird that that's a thing) pages just as fast. I think (and I assume the crux of the article is) the problem isn't shutting down all these "feminist content" but the fact that it's done a) inequitably and b) non-transparently.

    Do it across the board and be clear about what you're doing otherwise you're being a hater on one group.

anonymous Nov 19, 2012 9:04pm

Friendica might be a good alternative to facebook and it integrates with fb & twitter. maybe all women should move over to it!

anonymous Nov 19, 2012 11:38am

[…] […]

anonymous Nov 18, 2012 8:02pm

hi all! i’ve started a petition to take down the facebook page “it’s not rape, simply free sex.” please consider signing it and sharing it with your friends. this isn’t just about one stupid facebook group; it’s the fact that facebook does not see this as violating any “community guidelines.”

anonymous Nov 18, 2012 5:06am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:35pm

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists? | elephant journal. […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 6:50pm

[…] […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 10:12am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 9:41am

[…] year. Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 8:46am

[…] year. Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 8:40am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 8:33am

[…] Facebook hate all women or just […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 8:02am

[…] […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:55am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:54am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:51am

[…] year. Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:49am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:33am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 17, 2012 7:20am

[…] Because they’ve sold their soul to advertisers. Because they’re anti-pseudonym and pro-censorship. Etcetera, etcetera, […]

anonymous Nov 16, 2012 4:34pm

[…] the fourth article in a series discussing concerns that Facebook is anti-feminist. Please refer to the original article , the response from Facebook Policy Management, and the response from several of the groups […]

anonymous Nov 16, 2012 4:10pm

[…] the third article in a series discussing concerns that Facebook is anti-feminist. Please refer to the original article and the response from Facebook Policy Management. ~ […]

anonymous Nov 16, 2012 10:32am

Continuous requests for healthy policy change is a must; minor adjustments will slowly improve policies and protect our children from abusive policies of society.

anonymous Nov 16, 2012 8:16am

I'm embarking on a "See a nipple, report a nipple" on facebook, so whether it's Lahiri Mahasaya or some nameless beefcakes, it should get reported as pornography

anonymous Nov 15, 2012 9:37am

Facebook deleted my account without warning. Yes, I wrote a lesbian erotica vampire novella. However, my account wasn't deleted until I wrote and posted a blog about same sex marriage being a civil right. I had posted all kinds of questionable material and I have known friends who have as well. The misogynistic crap that is posted on facebook left and right is ridiculous. Also, I saw that a friend of mine had liked a page that is called "porn" and that posts nudity all the time, but I digress.

Yet, after I posted a blog defending same sex marriage during a time when prop 8 was going to an appeal process in CA, I am suddenly shut down without any warning. I have complained and my friends complained but facebook has not replied. My guess is that proponents of prop 8 banned together to get rid of me after reading my blog.

I decided not to go back to facebook for many reasons:
1) They do not care for the privacy or rights of any of their members. They have made my private profile public without warning due to their updates and they took away the ability for me to keep the comments I put on other people's statuses private. They seem to be hell bent on taking your privacy for granted. There is much more to the privacy thing that I will not go into but we do not have to put up with the invasion.
2) People don't communicate the way they used to because of facebook. Parents don't spend time with their kids because they are addicted to their facebook page. I was once at a party and people started showing us things that were on their facebook page. Next thing I know, the whole room was silent and everyone was in their own world, forgetting that a social gathering was going on around them. People who have facebook have no idea what they look like to those of us who stopped using it.
3) It was a huge time waster and when I think of the hours I spent on facebook, it is depressing to realize those were days of my life I can never get back.
4) It is a huge corporate organization that will use its clout to get what it wants and it has never considered the complaints of its members. Yet people stay on facebook due to its addictive qualities.
5) It bombards me with advertising. When I left facebook, I could see the sky, trees and mountains again. I could hear the birds chirping. It felt good to leave the matrix. Now I can focus on what I want to focus on.
6) I was getting stressed out by the fact that anything I said could be taken the wrong way and often was. Most things are not to be said in a public wall directly, to the people who want to hear it.
7) According to an elephent journal article I read, a corporate yoga instructor for facebook was fired for asking a student to turn off her cell phone and not take a call in the middle of a yoga class. Just another example of how facebook has no clue.
8) I had been annoyed by so many of facebooks policies and the way they handled their business but I stayed a member due to peer pressure. I will never do something that I do not agree with again. I would rather give my time to elephant journal or other websites who use practices that harmonize with my sense of the greater good.
9) it didn't help my businesses. Everything they say about facebook helping your business is bull. My numbers didn't go up after spending mind numbing time on facebook. Life coaches who want to make money off of training you how to use social media to your advantage say that so they can take your money and business. You get more clients and buyers by contacting people and being good at what you do, not for getting likes on facebook.

There are more reasons but i just can't think of them at the moment.

    anonymous Nov 15, 2012 11:48am

    This should be a full article – and you should publish it. Well said.

anonymous Nov 14, 2012 8:40pm

Love this article! Thank you Trista! I deactivated my FB account because of their unethical privacy policies and this information in your article has validated my decision. I'm a Twitter girl now. Thank you EJ for helping to get information on these troubling practices out in the open.

anonymous Nov 14, 2012 7:36pm

[…] […]

anonymous Nov 14, 2012 1:32pm

Here's an idea, if you don't like Facebook….don't use Facebook. Facebook is clearly automated & has rules.
Create your own network via email where there is no censorship.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 9:16pm

You guys are forgetting one thing : Facebook isn't a right, it's a free service. They can do whatever they want because they own the website. If they don't want nude post-masmectomy pictures, they're in their rights, even if it's "not fair". Because they're free and so popular, people start to mix up two concepts: free as in monetary and free as in liberty… You don't have all liberties on a private property.

Yet, I'm still debating if this really is sexism… A guy could post a picture of his testicles, he would get banned too…

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 10:41am

    I'm not sure that posting pictures of a women's mastectomy scar or women breastfeeding are the same thing as a man posting his balls.

    And, the male centric content that has been permitting certainly does not compare, including:

    "It's Not Rape, It's free sex",

    "Kicking a slut in the vagina and losing your foot inside",

    "[Humor] Roses are red, violets are blue… I've got a knife, , get in the van

    "I just want to get drunk and punch the slut in the face"

    "I'd Punch You if You Were a Woman"

    "Shut the F**k Up and Make Me a Sandwich"

    Furthermore, while Facebook may be a "free" service, it is hardly a non-profit. Facebook earns heaps of money based on mass participation. While they can do whatever they want, it may cost them their female customers.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 7:00pm

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists? […]

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 4:27pm

And let's not forget the racism angle too (intersectionality and whatnot). My college created a memes page, and some troll posted three pictures, one graphic photo of an aborted fetus and two that were explicitly racist and used the n-word. I reported them all TWICE, and I got an email from Facebook saying, "Nope! No hatred here!"

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 10:42am

    I'd like to explore this further Athena. Please contact me.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 1:10pm

[…] my sociological imagination and feminist radar first went on high alert, many other yoga practitioners have asked critical questions about the […]

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:55pm

This happens to pages without feminist content, as well. I have a friend who runs a fairly popular, video-game related page, and she has been blocked multiple times due to a few individuals spamming Facebook with false reports of copied or otherwise inappropriate content. It seems that Facebook simply does not review the claims of offensive content or of copyright infringement, and acts on the amount of complaints received rather than the actual merit of each complaint.

I imagine this system disproportionately affects feminist pages – particularly ones which repost others' Facebook and web comments – because of the sheer number of anti-feminists and misogynists reporting each post. It seems that a good way to censor people on Facebook is to methodically report every post they make, and every page whose content you don't agree with, over and over again until Facebook relents and "disciplines" the page owner. I see this happening with political pages I follow, where Facebook users of the opposite political persuasion sometimes mount concerted reporting attacks in an effort to get the page removed or the page owner blocked.

I hope Facebook reviews the way it responds to content complaints and subsequently censors pages and users, and becomes more thoughtful in their responses. Considering the number of feminist and other liberal-leaning users and the way in which Facebook has become a place for political discussion and movements, I think it would be a real shame for them if they got a reputation for censoring liberal political speech. Liberal users and pages not being able to add friends? Anti-rape campaigns censored? Images censored for no reason other than religious and/or political intolerance? Yeah, that story's going to blow up on Gawker and CNET post haste.

Don't bite the hand that feeds you, Facebook.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:50pm

The absolute worst thing we could do is boycott Facebook. Facebook is by far one of the fastest ways to spread a message. How did I find this article? Facebook. If you boycott Facebook, our messages and beliefs will not be heard by the masses, instead you will be letting the bastards with their rape joke pages win. Would you rather an impressionable teenage girl on Facebook stumble across a rape joke page, or a positive body image page? I know it's a ridiculous question, but boycott Facebook and these pages won't be there for the majority of people to see. Additionally, Wwhy would Facebook as a company care if a few feminists left? No skin off their nose. We have to fight this in THEIR space.

I personally think, as a woman who works for a tech company, one of the biggest problems is that there are hardly any women working in the tech sector. Why has all of the content mentioned in the article been moderated? Because the moderators, the Facebook policy makers and the board of directors at Facebook are, overwhelmingly white, middle aged men.

Until more women and girls begin to work in the tech sector, the mainstream media of the next generation, will unfortunately be run by men and the rape jokes will only become more and more acceptable.

    anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:54pm

    just to substantiate this further, this is a magazine we get delivered to our office, most weeks it has a "sexy" woman on the front holding a gadget. every time it arrives i complain that it's sexist, but month after month it falls through the door.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:15pm

“Never attribute to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity.” or cowardice
“Paranoia is the delusion that your enemies are organized.”

This is in no way to excuse or condone the administrative behavior, but it seems to me likeliest that it’s from cowardly ineptitude, followed by ass-covering.
I don’t know if that’s any help in trying to deal with it, though.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 11:47am

A page has been started on Facebook to report problem pages and to organize women/feminists to report them. Please "like" Rapebook.….

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 10:04am

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women – or just Feminists? ( Share this:ShareGoogle +1PrintPinterestStumbleUponEmailTumblrDiggFacebookRedditTwitterLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. Tags: bad romance, cynical, dating, feminsm, gender roles, Nicholas Sparks, Notebook, Romance, romantic, Ryan Gosling Permalink […]

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 7:41am

Thank you for writing this beautiful and interesting article, I am so disgusted with Facebook “supposely” security system, a few weeks ago hundreds of people were reporting pictures and pages that were so hurtful, mean and offensive and nothing was done. They were about a young teenager who committed suicide, a few pages were “created” by teens to make fun of her (after her death). The pictures, comments and content were horrible, and we kept reporting and reporting and absolutely NOTHING was done. Facebook has serious problems, something needs to change. When we try to address this issue with them all we receive is an automatic answer , it cannot continue like this. Mean hateful and hurtful pages ate still there while helpful, hopeful and kind pictures are being removed (breast cancer survivors for example) This is completely unacceptable coming from a multi millionaire company like Facebook.

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 11:43am

    Lydia, are you referring to Amanda Todd? I am working on the second follow-up article and would like to highlight that aspect of the story and share your comment. This morning I found the video,, including these last words, “Everyday I think why am I still here?” ~Amanda Todd

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 7:17am

Another social network to check out would be Diaspora. Their open source and not for profit (for now). The place could use some more community their. It has a fb/twitter feel to it for layout. I haven’t checked what the terms of use are inregards to offensive content and take down requests but anything would be better then Facebook.

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 1:49am

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists? | elephant journal. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. Leave a comment […]

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 11:16pm

Thank you for this! I also experienced discrimination by Facebook for trying to draw attention to Sexism in Mainstream Media – I was going after VICE Magazine for its Sexist content and was banned! This has got to stop!

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 10:24pm

Boycott. Tell FB to take it's double standards and put them where the sun doesn't shine. Go to G+, Twitter, DreamWidth. Seriously, FB is such a wasteland of insignificant junk that I maybe log in every 6 months. If you are active, they count you in their numbers, and use it to sell ads.

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 7:01pm

I guess you haven't seen this article ( ) about how Facebook outsources their content moderation to poor countries (the article specifically mentions Morocco, Turkey, the Philippines, Mexico, and India) where moderators are paid a tiny amount to inspect content that has been reported as offensive.

So on the one hand you have a silicon valley company (ie, very white and very male) writing up guidelines, and on the other hand you have enforcement of those guidelines outsourced to countries where awareness/acceptance of feminism and women's equality is not anywhere near as advanced as it is in North America/Western Europe. Is it any wonder that rape jokes are deemed OK while outspoken feminists get slapped down?

    anonymous Nov 13, 2012 11:48am

    I would like to read that article but the link does not work.

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 4:31pm

Lost me at "hypersexualized." People that are extremely anti-porn should cancel their internet. It's out there, waiting to get you, run!!
Facebook sucks.
Nonstop, one-track "feminists" that go overboard with it suck.
People that bash feminists too much suck.
For god's sake, can we all try maybe just not sucking so much for awhile? Maybe use some common sense and decency? Please?

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 2:03pm

“I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” — Andrea Dworkin

“In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.” — Catherine MacKinnon

“Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.” – Catherine Comins

“Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release.” — Germaine Greer

“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor

“To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” -– Valerie Solanas

Your average feminist leader.

straight from the horses mouth.

    anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:14pm

    Calling Andrea Dworkin, Catherine MacKinnon, and Valerie Solanas “average” feminist “leaders” is either completely dishonest or deeply delusional.

    anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:58pm

    Funny, I've been a feminist for years and I've never heard of any of 'em. But I guess you pay more attention to feminist "leaders" than I do.

    anonymous Dec 29, 2012 3:24pm

    these feminist = haters think they can spread their hate unoppessed and get all butthurt when they get a taste of there own medicene. i have no sypmathey for them

    anonymous Mar 14, 2013 12:51pm

    Oh how wide the pendulum swings. Extremes on both ends. There is a middle way and many choose to take it. Your skewed narrow view is truth for you but not for others.

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 1:17pm

[…] […]

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 12:52pm

A large amount of people on the internet are males under the age of 25 who hate and rather resent feminists

Its not just facebook that hates you its the entire internet…prepare for a raid.

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 12:47pm

I’ve never been officially blocked by Facebook but there have been times when I’ve mysteriously been unable to post anything or even ‘like’ other people’s posts. There are some feminist posts I’ve made that received no response, so I’m not sure whether my friends just chose to ignore them … or never got to see them.

Facebook was created by a bunch of guys who were frustrated because when they met a girl in person they had no way of knowing whether she was ‘already taken.’ It’s disgusting but not particularly surprising that such a social network would censor feminists.

Thanks for the information about other social networks that are more accepting of feminism.

    anonymous Nov 12, 2012 12:54pm

    no they just dont want you blasting your man hating crap on there

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 2:40pm

    I have had that experience as well Laura. Would like to explore it more but it has not been brought up much.

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 12:43pm

Cheers from Denmark!

We know all about it. We write about right wing extremists and have experienced beeing blocked from Facebook several times. Once just for linking to our blog!

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 9:57am

I'm a conflicted male. I'm a feminist and understand the meaning and the power behind it. I recognized some time ago the need for womens education and empowerment, yet I retain my male chauvenisim to a certain degree-guess I'm working to change the blueprint.
I don't understand how fb can block a person selectively, predominantly women from expressing their view or make judgement about them based on content yet allow online cyber bullying to continue and in some casers to be expanded. The case that comes to mind is Amanda Todd, a beautiful young teenager who took her own life last month due to bullying. On many of the support pages for this girl were listed many hate posts yet fb said they were powewerless to suppress them or remove them. I see that they are not as powerless as they claim if they can remove pics and posts of women in their natural state because they are 'offensive'.
I'm thinking women should start their own social network for their own support and they can post what ever they want

anonymous Nov 12, 2012 9:22am

FB are criminals. There are pages on FB promoting child pornography or openly sharing hardcore porn and they don't get removed for days or weeks after being reported. FB has refused to remove a child porn promotion page where images of barely clothed children in their bedrooms or taken from indiscrete angles are posted along with admirers discussions of what they want to do to those children. Nominate a new network and I'll be there with bells on.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 8:38pm

The problem is that there are so many women rights groups but they are not connected…
We need an internet webside where all feminist's blogs and women rights groups are coming together from all over the world.

    anonymous Nov 15, 2012 9:39am

    I must agree with this. The right wing hard core conservatives are extremely tight knit and very powerful.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 6:45pm

If I'm correct, I know the group to whom FB has outsourced the process of screening content. I already contacted the manager. But I'm sure they are only following FB policy, I just want to make sure the outsourcing guys are the not ones at fault.

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 2:38pm

    I would be interested to know if you received a response Tet. Thank you!

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 5:15pm

There has always been an inside joke among my friends around my breats (they are rather lovely, and not on the small side), and one friend jokingly said that one day they should have their own faebook page. I thought it was a funny idea, and if it was me controling the page and making sure I was comfortable with the exposue there shold be absolutely nothing wrong with it. Aftter all, the human body should be celebrated. All of the photos had my face cropped out and I was fully clothed in all of the images. There was absolutely no nudity, nothing over sexualized, or anything that could be even remotely offensive (half of them came directly from my profile pictures). It was all in good fun. It got removed in less than three days and I got a warning stating that if I posted these images again I would be banned. Type "boobs" into Facebook search and you will find hundreds of pages with thousands of followers where the women are in very suggestive poses, and you can tell the images come from Google searches. There is no consent from the women in these photos, and yet these are allowed to remain. That is what really got me. My page had 30 of my friends 'like' it, and that got enough attention to be removed, but all the other ones somehow slip through the cracks?

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 4:25pm

Vote with your feet. Organize to dump FB and move to one of the other social media platforms Trista listed. I don't understand why people are so hell bent on sticking with Facebook. These are strong, powerful, self-assured women Trista is describing, and yet when confronted with the problems of Facebook, everyone seems to act like a victim of domestic violence: "I would leave but…" If it were a local business treating women this way, you would not stand for it and you would most likely boycott. FB should be no different.

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 2:37pm

    Well said – I think I would like to quote this in my follow up article!

    anonymous Nov 15, 2012 9:43am

    I left facebook months ago because I didn't believe in its policies and life is so good without it. See my comment below. Give your time and support to media groups that harmonize with your ethics and vision. People have been dropping facebook by droves this past year. Cut the shackles. There is really no point sticking to any business that treats its members this way.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 2:55pm

[…] Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. FacebookFacebook hates feministsFacebook hates womenFeminismFeministIt's not rape…simply free sexRapeSexismSexual Assault ← Previous post Follow Blog via Email […]

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 2:02pm

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists?. Share this:EmailPrintRedditTumblrTwitterFacebookGoogle +1Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. Bookmark the permalink. […]

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 1:18pm

No it does NOT! The difference is when a woman accuses RANDOM men of being rapists just because they say “innocent until proven guilty” there is something wrong, You are standing up for women who put up personal information online about RANDOM MALE Individuals and called them Sexist Rapists without ZERO evidence and Not a single one of them has been convicted of ANY CRIME! All they did was CRITICIZE her when she said “ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS”

    anonymous Nov 11, 2012 1:40pm

    Kari it seems like this article covers a lot of ground so I find it interesting that you have minimized it to " standing up for women who put up personal information online about RANDOM MALE Individuals and called them Sexist Rapists without ZERO evidence". Significantly greater issues seem to be at play here.

      anonymous Dec 1, 2012 10:44am

      That doesn't invalidate the point that Kari made. Personally, the above article just seems like people whining because THEIR version of 'offensive' is different than someone else's. Facebook blocks all kinds of content from all kinds of sources. The 'nipple' rule is the most obvious one. I've seen famous works of art removed due to the dreaded nipple, as well as misogynistic portrayals of women removed for the same reason. They aren't "targeting feminists". Granted, they aren't exactly logical with their ban-hammer sometimes… but I really don't think it's in any way agenda driven.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 12:49pm

We are half the sky. Give us space to move in whatever way we cherish. Images of women breastfeedng babies, images of women smiling in spite of surgery…this is our womanly space, our womanly sky. Time to shine. Time to fly.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 8:58am has been blocked from posting to other pages. The content they complained about was a simple graphic comparing the GOP and Democrats Platforms prior to the election. I complained to no avail. We sense there are people on the right who target certain pages and just start reporting things. Facebook needs to actually evaluate what's being reported and not simply the number of reports they receive.

    anonymous Nov 14, 2012 2:35pm

    Karen, I would like to connect with you!

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 7:43am

[…] Does Facebook Hate All Women—or just Feminists? | elephant journal. Share this:TwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. Flokkar Uncategorized […]

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 7:39am

I think this is because Facebook has an automated system for tallying and responding to complaints. They feel it would be too costly to have real human beings doing this, which makes sense, but it seems like they should at least have real people “spot checking” to see if certain types of sites generate use complaints without actually crossing lines reasonable people think are offensive.

Sadly, there are still a lot of unreasonable people out there–people who will complain about things like breastfeeding moms, women who have had mastectomies, and even women speaking out on issues related to gender or culture.

Facebook is a private venue, and so free speech rights do not apply here. They can have policies and conditions for use of their site. But I agree it would be nice if they could find a way to enforce their them bit more consistently, or at least have a way of assessing why a complaint is being lodged and having a real human being second check to see if something really is a violation of their stated policies before they use the ban hammer.

It would also be nice if there was some sort of reciprocal ban they could levy on people who abuse the complaint system in order to get other members who are not really violating site policies banned themselves.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 6:32am

Sorry but no one wants to see a photo of your vagina./

    anonymous Nov 13, 2012 12:36pm

    Where does a picture of a vagina appear in the article? Where does discussion of a picture of a vagina appear in the article?

    Oh, right, it doesn't. If you're going to troll, at least read the damn essay.

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 11:49pm

I wrote an article on this subject. I really it's time for feminist trolls to take over the *virtual* world!

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 11:43pm

Facebook hate women,sure
Italian pages on Fb created by men,not censored:
-Culi perfetti
-I culi piu belli
-culi bellissimi

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 9:56pm

As a guy I'm horrified that in this day and age we still have blind institutions that treat one gender as less than another. My wish for the future is that all people can see each other, not as divided into two groups, (The us and them mentality) but can see the world is filled with an infinitely diverse collection of individuals who should respect and in turn be respected. The misogynistic, abhorrent pages that are referred to here and their ilk should be torn down while those that promote equality should be held up and praised.
There is no place for discrimination in today's world, nor should there have ever been.
Just my thoughts on the subject. Great post BTW.

    anonymous Nov 11, 2012 8:09am

    Does the Men who hate women page promote equality? I don't think so. I think that women could also write extremely hurtful comments and that those comments are no better than what men write.

    Other than that, good comment and I agree with your general message

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 6:16pm

Couldnt all these pages get together and sue FB for discrimination? I have tried to get rape sites taken down from FB and they said there was nothing wrong with these sites. Now I hear how feminist sites are being blocked. I say sexual discrimination.

    anonymous Nov 10, 2012 6:00pm

    hmmm…class action? Any attorneys want to weigh in on that…not sure since it is a free network….

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 4:57pm

I've never been blocked, thank goodness or unable to add friends, HOWEVER I sent in complaints about a woman in England who seemed like some kind of celebrity and/or singer at a SlutWalk there, and she had outrageous red hair, and a BIG Black Swastika on one of her arms…very prominent. When I looked at more of her photographs, she had a stylized swastika, not so easily detectable on the other arm. It had people in it…but the big very obvious black one constantly seen in picture after picture of her, really, really bothered me. I reported it as hate speech, and asked that photo be taken down. Facebook supposedly reviewed it, and DID NOTHING. Then the woman herself wrote me giving me all kinds of excuses of the long history of the Swastika(as one raised Jewish, I have done my research myself around this symbol). I told her even the Native Americans distanced themselves from the symbol, since the Nazis took over, and they fought in WW2(the Native Americans), and that no Westerner should be wearing this symbol openly on their flesh, unless of course they want to be associated with White Power!

So, this crap doesn't surprise me at all, and there has to be better forums for us than Facebook.

    anonymous Nov 10, 2012 5:37pm

    Tell that to the 1.3 billion Hindus & Buddhists in the world who still find that symbol sacred.

      anonymous Nov 10, 2012 9:18pm

      Note that she said white westerners.

        anonymous Nov 11, 2012 8:05am

        Note that there are Hindus and Buddhists in the world that are white westerners.

    anonymous Nov 12, 2012 11:22am

    I understand how the image might upset you, but before Nazis took the symbol it was one of with a meaning of eternity and peace.
    Don't be so quick to let something as personal as the Holocaust cloud your judgement on the symbol, otherwise you end up becoming like other small minded people who also force issues based on what they believe to be right without further information.

    anonymous Nov 12, 2012 1:16pm

    So, you would throw away over three thousand years of history because of twenty or so years of misappropriation? You're about as bright as a burned out light bulb!

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 4:56pm

Want change? We need the board to change!

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 3:37pm

Thank you for sharing your story Esther.

    anonymous Nov 10, 2012 4:12pm

    After hearing about all the blocks of "feminist" posts I started thinking just over the last few days about why we just don't leave FB behind and start another way of meeting and communicating. Hell, there must be many women out there in the big wide world who could create a new area of comminication similar to FB and give them a run for their money, where "blocking" would be fairly done and for the right reasons, and a feminist or ecoist or evironmentalist could speak freely and connect with other like-minded people; where the power wouldn't be in the hands of a rich, white, heterosexual male dominated executive! Lo and behold – great minds think alike – you have a list here of new areas where we can meet and share ideas and offer support. Thank you all you wonderful people out there. You have proven, where there is a will there is a way. Human nature is unstoppable!

      anonymous Nov 10, 2012 4:16pm

      In case I wasn't clear – haha – I don't need FB! There are other ways of connecting. Let's all leave FB enmasse, and watch the devils' stocks plummet. There are enough of us!

anonymous Nov 10, 2012 3:31pm

I've been blocked – for from three days to a whole month – and have been bewildered about the reason. My pages contain primarily feminist material, other political and environmental material, and horses and dogs. I now intend, after reading this article, to explore the other social media you suggest. Many, many thanks for this. It's vital that women connect and communicate now.

anonymous Nov 11, 2012 11:25am

Thank you! My husband is Norwegian so he can help me!! Please connect with me Jens!

anonymous Nov 13, 2012 5:08pm

Hi. I would really like to read the article you suggest. If you had the chance to translate it to spanish (so I could link it on my fb wall), it would be great, if not english is ok.

anonymous Nov 14, 2012 12:53pm

Thank you for letting me know. If you have anything further to add, please email me. I am working on a follow up article. Thank you!

anonymous Nov 14, 2012 1:11pm

I am not sure if he will do a literal translation. I tried putting it in google translate and it was horrible. We are apart at the moment, so I hope to speak to him on Skype this evening so he can translate it for me.