The Truth Behind Photoshop. {Video}

get elephant's newsletter

Screen shot 2013-10-30 at 2.11.19 PM

By now, all of us have seen articles and videos showing how Photoshop and other image-enhancing software is used to manipulate images.

However, the short video clip below is one the best I have see showing to what extreme it can be used.

The video adds fuel to the growing debate over whether or not images should feature labels saying whether or not they have been Photoshopped.

Two years ago, a group of teenaged girls tried (unsuccessfully) to pressure Teen Vogue to stop using heavily-manipulated images urging that such images were unrealistic and hurt vulnerable girls’ self-esteem. Critics fired back that such images are fantasy and that the consumers of such images either already know that or should be aware that is the case.

Regardless of how you stand on the debate, it is worth saying (again) that sometimes what you see isn’t really what you get.


Want 15 free additional reads weekly, just our best?

Get our weekly newsletter.

Ed: Sara Crolick


is a new feature on Elephant Journal—enabling you to instantly share your mindful ideas, photos, art, YouTube videos/Instagram links & writings with our 5 million readers. Try it Now.

Write Now

About Kimberly Lo

Kimberly Lo is a yoga instructor and freelance editor & writer based in Charlottesville, VA. In her spare time, she enjoys needlework, travel, and photography. Connect with her on Facebook.


8 Responses to “The Truth Behind Photoshop. {Video}”

  1. Erica says:

    Wow!! That is crazy!! I say disclaimers would be a great thing!

  2. studiorsantacruz says:

    It's not Photoshop that's bad, it's an amazing tool for artists and photographers! It's the users that take things to extremes!

  3. Krishnabrodhi says:

    What I don't fully get is why none of the blame about "perpetuating a false beauty standard" is ever seemed to be given to the makeup artists. In this shoot the makeup artist did a significant amount of work before the photoshop artist did a thing. I'm not trying to argue whether or not these images have an effect on girls. I'm just curious why all the blame seems to go to the photoshop artists. You can do a image search for before and after makeup pics and see HUGE changes on women that never see any extra work done by a photoshop artists. I think if the blame game is gonna be played with this the blame could probably be dealt our a little more evenly to all those involved.

    • alwayspresent says:

      a make up artists doesn't extend legs lower buttocks chop off stomachs.
      Makeup has always been used as an enhancement but digital retouching to take blemishes away
      and even imperfections has been around…but when did we start to actually change size of eyes and
      cut body parts down while stretching legs to unnatural lengths? Now we're inventing new species of
      women that are made up.

    • Monica Ybarra says:

      The difference between makeup and photoshop is that a girl has access to makeup and makeup lessons. Girls can't walk around airbrushed by photoshop no matter how much they wish they could.

  4. Steph says:

    I thought she looked great before photoshop slimmed and extended her features. She looked very artificial once it was done- like a doll more than a human being. Too bad we can't just leave what nature created alone and call it beautiful.

  5. Kimberly , good job! Thank you for sharing a nice video.

  6. Luke says:

    What was the point in even using a model? They may as well have made a computer-generated drawing of a female model from scratch as there was no resemblance to the real person.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.