Growing up, I never questioned it:

A man is supposed to lead. A man is supposed to provide. Not just financially, but emotionally.

I was raised in a deeply evangelical household where this belief wasn’t just implied—it was the foundation of what I understood about relationships. The idea was simple: a man would take care of me, emotionally and otherwise, and in return, I would follow his “lead.”

For years, this belief shaped how I approached love. I didn’t just want a partner; I was subconsciously looking for someone to fill my emotional gaps, to make me feel steady when I felt unmoored, to give me a sense of worth when I struggled to find my own.

It wasn’t until my marriage started unraveling that I saw the cracks.

Realizing the Cost of Emotional Dependence

I remember the moment it hit me. I was sitting across from my husband, waiting—waiting for him to fix how I felt, waiting for him to somehow pull me out of the emotional spiral I was in. And he didn’t. He couldn’t.

And for the first time, I saw what I had been doing. I had outsourced my emotional stability to him. I had expected him to regulate my emotions, to provide constant reassurance, to be the unwavering anchor I had never learned to be for myself.

The scariest part? I had no idea how to do it on my own.

It made me wonder: How many of us were raised to believe that emotional stability comes from someone else?

How We Misunderstand the Provider Narrative

At its core, the idea of a “provider” is about security. And emotional security is something we all need.

But here’s where it gets complicated: What does emotional security actually mean?

We tend to define it in external terms—having someone who is dependable, supportive, and steady. Someone we can count on to be there for us, through every high and low. And that’s valid—relationships should provide support.

But where we get lost is in believing that emotional security comes from another person rather than being something we cultivate within ourselves.

What starts as a desire for connection can slowly morph into dependence. Instead of seeing a partner as someone who supports our emotional growth, we start seeing them as the source of our emotional well-being. And when that happens, we risk losing ourselves in the process.

This is how the “provider” narrative can be misunderstood: it subtly teaches us that security means relying on someone else to make us feel okay.

But true emotional security isn’t about outsourcing our emotions—it’s about knowing we have the inner tools to navigate them, whether we’re in a relationship or not.

Where Do We Learn This Narrative?

This misunderstanding isn’t random. It’s deeply ingrained, reinforced through religion, culture, and societal messaging in ways we often don’t even notice. This idea of the provider isn’t just about money—it runs much deeper. It’s the belief that one person should be the stable, unwavering rock in a relationship. That emotional security is something we receive rather than something we build within ourselves.

And once I started looking, I saw this message everywhere:

>> Culture and media: We grow up watching fairytales and romance movies that tell us love will save us. Cinderella needs a prince to rescue her from hardship. Sleeping Beauty waits for a kiss to awaken her. Even modern love stories often push the idea that a relationship—especially a man’s devotion—will make everything okay.

>> Religious and traditional teachings: Many belief systems emphasize that men should lead, protect, and emotionally guide their families, while women should lean on them for support. Even outside of religion, traditional gender roles reinforce this same dynamic—men as steady, strong providers; women as emotional dependents.

>> Everyday advice: Phrases like “a good man provides” or “find someone who takes care of you” sound harmless but subtly reinforce the idea that emotional stability is something to seek in another, rather than cultivate within.

Even in the world of social media and relationship advice, we often hear that a woman’s “feminine energy” flourishes when she allows her partner to take charge. This idea suggests that true happiness and emotional fulfillment come when a woman leans into her partner’s support and leadership—when she can “relax” and let him be the emotional rock. The message is alluring, especially in a world that feels overwhelming, where the idea of releasing some of the emotional weight might sound like the escape we’ve been longing for.

I completely understand the appeal. There’s something deeply comforting about the notion of being cared for and supported, of not always having to carry the emotional load. Many women feel the pressure of constantly managing everything in their lives—work, family, relationships—and the idea of surrendering to someone else’s guidance can feel like a relief. There’s a longing for balance, for moments of peace where we don’t have to do all the time.

But here’s the gentle truth: While there is power in resting into our softer, more receptive energies, there’s also a risk in believing that emotional fulfillment and security should always come from someone else. The idea that we need someone else to “make us feel okay” or to provide constant validation—whether it’s through attention, reassurance, or emotional caretaking—can unintentionally foster dependency. We may start to believe that our worth and emotional well-being are contingent on someone else’s actions, rather than building a solid sense of self from within.

Over time, these messages blur the line between partnership and dependence, making it easy to mistake emotional reliance for love, stability, and security.

We absorb it everywhere. And because it feels familiar, it starts to feel true.

When these ideas go unexamined, they shape the way we approach relationships in ways we don’t even realize. I know this because I lived it.

The Hidden Cost of Dependence

When I work with clients, I often ask them to make a list of the emotional skills they want to pass on to their children.

The answers are always the same: resilience, emotional regulation, self-worth, the ability to navigate challenges without becoming overwhelmed.

Then I ask them a harder question: Have you developed these skills for yourself?

And that’s where things get uncomfortable.

Because while we want our children to be emotionally self-sufficient, many of us—especially those raised with traditional gender roles—were never encouraged to develop that same independence. Instead, we were taught to rely on a partner for emotional guidance, as though our well-being is something that should be given to us rather than cultivated within us.

But emotional dependence, even when it feels comforting, can limit us.

It can keep us in relationships where we mistake attachment for love. It can make us resentful when our partners don’t meet our unspoken expectations. It can stop us from learning how to navigate our emotions in a way that strengthens us rather than weakens us.

The Emotional Trap of the Provider Narrative

My upbringing, like many others, ingrained in me the idea that a man should be the “leader” in a relationship, responsible for my emotional well-being, my happiness, and even my sense of self-worth.

For a long time, I unconsciously sought this dynamic. What I realize now is that I wasn’t just looking for a partner—I was inadvertently searching for an emotional caretaker, someone who could offer the validation, stability, and reassurance I hadn’t yet learned to cultivate within myself.

In hindsight, I can see how that expectation set my relationships up for imbalance. I placed a responsibility on my partner that no one person should have to carry, and in doing so, I stunted my own emotional growth.

This is the hidden cost of the provider narrative—it discourages us from developing emotional autonomy.

When we’re taught to rely solely on a partner for emotional stability, we never fully learn how to self-soothe, regulate our emotions, or build resilience. Instead, we become dependent on someone else to “fix” things, to offer constant reassurance, to be the steady foundation we never learned to be for ourselves.

And on the flip side? Men are told they need to be that rock.

The Unseen Burden on Men

From an early age, many men are raised to believe that their worth is tied to how well they provide—not just financially, but emotionally. They’re expected to be strong, unwavering, and always capable of handling their partner’s emotions.

This expectation creates an impossible standard. It can teach men that showing vulnerability is a failure, that expressing their own emotional struggles is weak, and that their primary role in a relationship is to absorb and regulate their partner’s emotions—often at the expense of their own.

The result? Men may suppress their emotions, struggle to communicate their needs, and feel immense pressure to always “have it together.” They’re conditioned to be problem-solvers rather than partners in emotional intimacy. Instead of being allowed to experience and process their own feelings, they’re expected to be the ones holding everything together.

Over time, this takes a toll. It creates relationships where one person is carrying the emotional weight for both partners, leading to burnout, resentment, and disconnection. When men aren’t given the space to be emotionally vulnerable, they miss out on the very intimacy and support that relationships are meant to provide.

When “Providing” Becomes Emotional Dependence

Our brains love shortcuts. And the “provider” narrative is one of them.

When we hear the word, we don’t stop to unpack its complexities. Instead, we can latch onto the simplest explanation: Someone else handles it.

So when we apply that to emotional security, we unknowingly create a one-sided dynamic. Women are taught to look outward for emotional stability instead of building it within, while men are taught to carry it alone instead of opening a space for support as well.

For me, this meant entering relationships expecting my partner to be my emotional anchor. I looked to him for reassurance, for validation, for a sense of self. And when he couldn’t meet my emotional needs the way I expected? It wasn’t just disappointing—it felt like something was deeply wrong.

But the truth was, I had handed over emotional responsibility rather than developing my own.

And that’s what this misunderstanding of “provider” does—it places people in roles they were never meant to fill alone.

>> For women, it can create emotional dependence. Instead of learning how to regulate our own emotions, set boundaries, and build self-worth from within, we may look to a partner to do it for us.

>> For men, it can create emotional isolation. They may feel the pressure to always be strong, never falter, and absorb not only their emotions but their partner’s as well.

Over time, this imbalance can lead to frustration, burnout, and relationships that feel more like emotional labor than genuine partnership.

Does This Mean We Don’t Need Support?

Absolutely not.

We all need love. We all need connection. But there’s a difference between support and dependence.

For years, I believed that emotional security meant finding someone who could carry my feelings for me. Now, I see it differently. True emotional security comes from knowing that while I can lean on others, my sense of worth and stability isn’t dependent on them. It comes from knowing that I have the tools to self-soothe, to set boundaries, to regulate my emotions, and to stand firm in my own sense of self.

I’ve realized that true emotional freedom and strength come from learning to nurture ourselves in ways that aren’t dependent on someone else’s behavior.

It’s also powerful to rest into our own strength, to know that we can be both supported and self-sufficient, both soft and strong—sometimes within the same moment. It’s not about rejecting the support or comfort we receive from others, but rather about balancing that with the ability to be emotionally self-sufficient. When we develop emotional autonomy—when we can understand, process, and manage our emotions on our own—we’re not only more whole within ourselves, but we’re also able to bring a more grounded, secure version of ourselves to our relationships.

And here’s the thing: relationships thrive when both partners are emotionally autonomous.

When we stop expecting someone else to be our emotional caretaker, we create space for something deeper—partnership based on mutual support, not silent emotional contracts that neither person can truly fulfill.

Rewriting the Story

The real issue isn’t just the provider narrative in itself—it’s the way we’ve been conditioned to interpret it.

There’s nothing wrong with wanting a partner who is supportive, reliable, and emotionally present.

The problem arises when we confuse emotional security with emotional dependence.

Emotional security means feeling safe to express yourself, to be seen and understood. It’s about mutual support, where both partners are able to show up for each other without one person being solely responsible for the other’s emotional well-being.

Emotional dependence, on the other hand, happens when we rely too heavily on our partner to validate us, to fix our emotions, or to define our sense of self-worth. It creates an imbalance where one person carries the emotional load while the other suppresses their own needs to maintain the role of the “provider.”

So, how do we shift this narrative?

I learned it starts with reparenting ourselves—cultivating the same emotional resilience, self-worth, and self-awareness that we strive to teach our children.

It means asking ourselves some tough questions:

>> Am I seeking constant reassurance or compliments from my partner to feel good about myself or my decisions?

>> Do I find myself feeling insecure or incomplete when my partner isn’t around to support or validate me?

>> When I’m feeling upset, do I expect my partner to make me feel better immediately?

>> Do I rely on solely my partner to calm me down when I feel emotionally out of control, rather than learning how to self-regulate?

>> Do I wait for them to offer solutions to my problems instead of reflecting on them myself?

>> Do I feel like I need to be strong all the time, even when I’m struggling?

>> Do I struggle with being alone, and feel like I need to constantly be with someone to feel “complete” or “whole”?

>> Do I rely solely on my partner to manage certain aspects of my emotional life (like handling conflict or comforting me when I’m upset) because I don’t know how to handle it on my own?

>> Do I feel responsible for my partner’s emotions?

>> Do I only share what I think will keep the peace, rather than being completely honest about what I need or feel?

I had to deeply reflect on these dynamics in my own marriage so I could identify patterns that I wanted to change. Reflecting on these questions isn’t about making myself feel guilty or ashamed of my current relationship. Instead, it’s about becoming aware of patterns that might be influencing how I show up emotionally.

Recognizing these patterns doesn’t mean I’ve failed; it just means I’m learning how to grow and find balance in how I relate to myself and others.

What I didn’t realize until much later was that how I was interpreting and conditioned to see this narrative was slowly eroding my marriage. And when that dynamic went unexamined, it created a space where neither of us felt truly seen, understood, or emotionally whole.

When we start building emotional autonomy, our relationships shift. We move away from dependence and toward true partnership—where both people feel seen, supported, and emotionally whole.

This isn’t about rejecting support or avoiding connection. It’s about creating relationships where both partners can be strong, vulnerable, and emotionally balanced—together.

Real, healthy relationships are built on mutual emotional strength—where both partners can support each other without losing themselves in the process.

By examining the narratives, the expectation of roles, the subconscious beliefs we hold, we give ourselves the freedom to build relationships that are rooted in balance, authenticity, and shared emotional growth.

And I’ve found that’s a big part of what real love looks like.

~