Frank Bruno knows better. [University of Colorado flaunts Boulder's historic height restrictions]

Via on Jan 9, 2009

Frank Bruno is a good man, and a smart man—who until recently was man-ager of the City of Boulder. So it’s hard to see his aww shucks, we shoulda told you, I feel your pain response to CU’s latest up-yours his recent employer—Boulder, Colorado—as either duplicitous or incompetent. And he ain’t incompetent.

Look, no one says a big building is a bad idea. But Boulder’s height restrictions have preserved the character of a city—and some views of our Flatirons, our God-made equivalent of the Empire State Building.

Say it ain’t so, Frank Bruno, make it right:

Colorado Daily tells the sad story:

The University of Colorado’s plan to build a four-story building this spring that would tower over the city’s height limit in a neighborhood north of campus has surprised and alarmed Boulder officials.

City staff said they would have liked to weigh in on the design of the proposed building much earlier, but the project “has unfortunately been brought to the planning department’s attention late in the process,” according to a memo delivered to the City Council this week.

And while CU officials agree they should have shared their plans sooner for the 50,000-square foot building at 15th Street and Grandview Avenue, they say they badly need the building and intend to move forward.

As a state entity, the university isn’t bound by Boulder’s building rules, so city officials have almost no leverage to stop a CU project.

Still, Frank Bruno, CU’s vice chancellor for administration, said the university is trying to do a better job communicating with the city on future construction projects. Bruno, who was Boulder’s city manager until April of last year, said he would have liked the city to have had more time to review the project and provide suggestions.

“The point is, this doesn’t feel right,” Bruno said. “It doesn’t feel comfortable. There was not enough time given to the city for review and comment … I realize we are not fully addressing the city’s concerns. I’m more than willing to say this is not the way we want to conduct business or our relationship between the city and university. We are committed to improving.”

The project is planned between CU’s Armory Building and Boulder High School’s football field, in a neighborhood that’s been the source of heated disagreements between the city and university in the past.

…Both Bruno and the campus architect inherited the project, which was approved by the Board of Regents in June 2007 — before either of them worked at the university.

Scale-drawings provided to the city by CU show the building would be about 75-feet tall — 20 feet higher than the city’s 55-foot height limit.

Although CU might consider minor adjustments — such as moving a mechanical and electrical box from the roof to ground level — the project will go forward since it’s received regent approval, Bruno said. Construction is expected to begin this spring, although it likely will not begin in March as originally planned, he said.

School officials plan to spend up to $15.7 million on the building…Paul Leef, CU’s campus architect, said planners considered removing the building’s fourth story and adding a wing instead. But they decided against the redesign because it would cost $1.5 million and delay construction, he said.

The brick building with a tile roof is planned for the east side of 15th, where there is now a university-owned parking lot, Leef said.

Richard Jessor, a CU professor in the Institute of Behavioral Science, said the institute’s 40 faculty members are now housed in 10 buildings spread out along Grandview and in downtown Boulder.

The institute has been successful on the campus, doubling its grants over the past decade from $20 million to more than $40 million, he said. Not having a central hub for researchers compromises the institute’s work, Jessor said.

“We are in these little old buildings,” he said. “We’re separated. We cannot maximize our collaborative work when we are in disciplinary silos.”

‘So little progress’

The Grandview neighborhood has been a bone of contention between the city and CU for well over a decade. In the late 1990s, historic preservation activists, representatives from the city and CU spent years hammering out an agreement for the fate of several historic bungalows in the neighborhood.

Both sides agreed to the creation of a historic district in the neighborhood, and signed a “memorandum of agreement” to better manage the area. As part of that agreement, the city gave up some of its rights-of-way in the area, while CU officials agreed to consult the city before embarking on development plans.

That agreement got overturned in court following a lawsuit by the Native American Rights Fund, whose officials objected at being included in the district. But “both the city and the university have continued to follow many of the actions it outlined,” according to a city memo.

Betty Chronic, a historic preservation activist who spent years working on the Grandview neighborhood issues, said CU’s plans were a slap in the face. Chronic said she’d hoped whatever was built on the site would fit in with the much-smaller buildings around it.

“I thought it would be a site that would balance the neighborhood,” she said. “It saddens me that we have made so little progress with good university-community relationships. It saddens me that the university wants to demonstrate its power.”

 

 

About Waylon Lewis

Waylon Lewis, founder of elephant magazine, now elephantjournal.com & host of Walk the Talk Show with Waylon Lewis, is a 1st generation American Buddhist “Dharma Brat." Voted #1 in U.S. on twitter for #green two years running, Changemaker & Eco Ambassador by Treehugger, Green Hero by Discovery’s Planet Green, Best (!) Shameless Self-Promoter at Westword's Web Awards, Prominent Buddhist by Shambhala Sun, & 100 Most Influential People in Health & Fitness 2011 by "Greatist", Waylon is a mediocre climber, lazy yogi, 365-day bicycle commuter & best friend to Redford (his rescue hound). His aim: to bring the good news re: "the mindful life" beyond the choir & to all those who didn't know they gave a care. elephantjournal.com | facebook.com/elephantjournal | twitter.com/elephantjournal | facebook.com/waylonhlewis | twitter.com/waylonlewis | Google+ For more: publisherelephantjournalcom

1,183 views

Appreciate this article? Support indie media!

(We use super-secure PayPal - but don't worry - you don't need an account with PayPal.)

9 Responses to “Frank Bruno knows better. [University of Colorado flaunts Boulder's historic height restrictions]”

  1. Suzanne Lainson says:

    I had lived in Boulder for years before I realized there was a height restriction. And then I had an aha! moment. Yes, that’s what makes Boulder so great. You can actually see the sun. I don’t like cities because most of them always feel so dark. Boulder is great because it has big city cultural and lifestyle esources, but it looks and feels like the small town that it is. I love hanging out on Pearl Street and soaking up the atmosphere.

  2. elephant journal admin says:

    Thanks for the comment. It’s a real shame how CU is acting—as if they’re an island, separate from their larger community. Please do me a favor, anyone who reads this, if so inspired: post this to your facebook using the above button. It just takes a click, and this is one issue I think that, if Mr. Bruno and CU get enough constructive feedback, they just might make some concessions.

  3. This seeems like it will be worse than the Folsom Field towers. Ugh. It’s going to cut into a lot of view from “down-hill”. Painful and ridiculous. Every person involved in that project knew exactly what they were doing in not sharing the plans with the City sooner. Great blog title, indeed!

  4. Roger Wolsey Roger Wolsey says:

    The house I live in is in the shadow of the towering corporate suites mega-complex that was tacked onto the east side of the Folsom Stadium. I understand that before that monstrosity was erected, my home, and the entire University Heights neighborhood, enjoyed magnificent views of the Flat Irons and the foothills.

    However, I didn’t live here to see the before and after. I just know things as they are today. CU will do what CU will do – Boudler be damned. Empire is as empire does. I can live with that.

    But what irks me is the hypocricy and the thinly veild facade and pretense of CU having offices and departments of “community and neighborhood relations”, etc.
    Why pretend to give a damn about what the citizens of Boulder have to say and then go ahead and do what you were going to do anyway?

    Come to think of it, I’m not even sure why I’m bothering to comment about this at all. It’s not like CU cares or is willing to be swayed by real engagment with real parties other than them (they’d first have to acknowledge that there ARE other parties and that there IS a table for them to meet around). Unless… perhaps, there may be a human or two with a soul and a conscience behind those ivory towers. Here’s to shouting in the wind…

  5. elephant journal admin says:

    Shannon McNeeley at 4:48pm January 12
    Do you have a suggestion for what to do beyond forwarding? Sounds like it might be too late to participate in any public dialog through the normal channels? What would be the best course of public action?

    Waylon Hart Lewis at 4:50pm January 12
    I sent it to City Council and to Frank, both, and discussion will happen. Frank hinted that some concessions, minor ones, might happen. I think it’s our role to apply pressure, keep the issue in the air.

  6. Evan Ravitz says:

    It’s straight out of the Simpsons: Evil CU blots out the very sun, giver of life -and lowerer of heating bills and fossil-fuel burning.

    But there’s poetic justice: Bruno, and the City of Boulder he managed, are blotting out the sun all along Canyon Blvd. with the “variances” on existing zoning height restrictions awarded to the developers who fund City Council campaigns.

    And don’t forget the “variance” to zoned height just awarded by Planning Board (training ground for future City Councilors) to the developer of the Washington School project.

    PLEASE email council@bouldercolorado.gov asking Council to reconsider the insulting treatment Planning Board gave the Washington neighbors, even ignoring recommendations of City staff!

  7. [...] Kitchen is a community bistro located in historic downtown Boulder and is open seven days a week. The menu evolves seasonally and reflects the simple and [...]

  8. Myrtis Levis says:

    Wonderful paintings! That is the kind of information that are meant to be shared around the net. Disgrace on the search engines for no longer positioning this submit higher! Come on over and discuss with my web site . Thanks =)

Leave a Reply