Genghis Khan got with so many chicks there’s a .5% chance you’re related to him.

Via elephant journal
on Mar 23, 2011
get elephant's newsletter

50 Cent? Bret Michaels? Ozzy Osbourne?


Update via the actual art director, with thanks: “they were not done by the Smithsonian? You can find the full story here.”

We’ve got nothing on history, “Historically Hardcore” points out. Bring it:


About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive.


3 Responses to “Genghis Khan got with so many chicks there’s a .5% chance you’re related to him.”

  1. ARCreated says:

    LOL!!!!! awesome!!

  2. elephantjournal says:

    Whitney R: I hate to be a buzzkill, but there's a good chance that many of those "chicks" were actually "gotten" through rape.

    Jonathan W: ‎^ Well, no shit Sherlock.

    # Whitney: uggh. Well at least the other two ads above are still pretty right on.
    32 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
    Jonathan W: Oh good grief. Please don't start on Genghis Khan with some psuedo-buddhist, politically correct, marxist-feminist revisionist, Andrea Dworkin wannabe critique.

    Whitney R: Insightful comment, Jonathan. You've made me reconsider. Now that you mention it, my opposition to rape must stem from my feminist indoctrination in college. I now see that historical rape is actually funny.

    Chuck Kreider so that explains it 😉

    # Comment award of the day, Whitney. Jonathan, your (let's keep it self-humorful, respectful, but not PC is great) move. ~ W.

    Jonathan Winocour
    Okay…let me see…I appreciate the "insightful" damning with faint praise, so let me just put a mirror on that, and ask how much "insight" it took to figure out Genghis Khan's numerous sexual "conquests" were not willing supplicants? What…'s more, if we're really gonna get interesting, let's talk about whether Brett Michaels is engaging in some species of "rape" (if you'll concede "rape" is an ill-defined term) by predating on the woefully stupid amongst the female population by showing them his stairway to heaven.

    Brian: He was a conqueror. Divine say some. It was customary in his time to take from the vanquished. Women were considered to be bounty and property. I understand your anger at the hint of rape, but it has not been very long in history that women have the control of their lives like they do here today in America.

  3. caroline says:

    the smithsonian isn't down with these.. they were done by design students for a school project. what do you think the smithsonian didn't like?? .. here is some more work by one of the artists: