Every Little Bit Helps…or Does it? ~ Oz Osborn

Via elephant journal
on Apr 6, 2012
get elephant's newsletter
photo by Jill Barth

I won’t pull any punches. Ideological naysayers notwithstanding, our biosphere is in deep, deep trouble. This means that all living species on this planet–including us ‘clever apes’—are also in trouble.

Global climate disruption is the most obvious example, but there are a whole host of converging (and often inter-related) calamities to consider—the biodiversity crisis, population overshoot, freshwater depletion, topsoil depletion and degradation, oceanic acidification, nitrogen pollution and attendant dead zones, desertification, habitat/ecosystem loss, the wholesale destruction of rainforests, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, Colony Collapse Disorder—the list goes on and on.

(Photo by Robby van Moor)

As Paul Gilding has succinctly put it: the Earth is full.

We’re deep into what Bill Catton has called ‘overshoot’ in terms of the Earth’s ecological carrying capacity. And don’t even get me started on the concomitant challenges in the realm of social justice!

I know I’m preaching to the choir here—I’m confident that the majority of those reading this article are aware of environmental issues and most are committed to doing ‘something’ about them. It’s good to be among friends.

That said, the challenge becomes to define what that ‘something’ should be in order to achieve an effective outcome. And therein lies a particularly pernicious rub.

You see, we’ve been taught to buy into what I believe to be a fallacy: that we can ‘help the environment’ (perhaps even save the planet!) if only we will pay attention to the little things—a view embodied in the common expression: ‘every little bit helps.’ Since we environmentalists are nothing if not conscientious, we do our best to comply.

We turn off the lights when leaving a room—and those lights are of course low power compact fluorescents (and soon, LEDs), in place of extravagantly consumptive incandescents.

We turn off the water when brushing our teeth and when doing our dishes, and we use drip emitters to water our landscaped plants (or even xeriscape), so as to conserve. We recycle, thus diverting a portion of our waste stream from the landfill—and we attend to the other (lesser emphasized) members of that triumvirate: to reduce and reuse (some of us even freecycle).

We take part in initiatives to plant trees to help offset rainforest loss, and we drive 50 mpg hybrids rather than 25 mpg ‘gas guzzlers.’ We dutifully turn our thermostats up in the summer and down in the winter by a couple of (or for some of the more hardy, a few) degrees.

We make purchases with our eco-hats on to reduce ‘carbon miles’ and support eco-minded suppliers, whether for food purchases (hoorah for local and sustainable organic!) or clothing, or anything else. And on and on.

Taking these small—and (importantly) more or less painless – steps will add up to big changes, we’re taught. And I gotta say—kudos! I am very aware that many of us make such conscious sacrifices every day, and I’m very proud to be a part of such a conscious and conscientious movement. We are indeed fighting the good fight.

And after all, it’s worth it, because every little bit helps.

But, as Byron Katie might ask, ‘is it true?’

Consider this seemingly plausible suggestion from the Blueprint for a Green Economy, out of the UK—an explicit example of the ‘every little bit helps’ logic that we so often see:

“The mobile phone charger averages around… 1W consumption, but if every one of the country’s 25 million mobile phones chargers were left plugged in and switched on they would consume enough electricity (219GWh) to power 66 000 homes for one year.”

photo by larksflem

Now that sounds substantial, doesn’t it? Powering 66,000 homes for an entire year! And ensuring that one’s phone charger remains unplugged when not needed—hey, even I can remember to do that!

But now consider that there are 25 million homes in the UK—and that 66,000 is 0.26% of that. In other words, the proposal in question would save about one quarter of one percent of the electricity consumed by homes in the UK. That’s not a lot—that is, in fact, very little. It’s a ‘little bit.’

As David MacKay, a physics professor at the Univ of Cambridge (and the guy who came up with this example) says:

“If everyone does a little, we’ll achieve only a little. We must do a lot. What’s required are big changes.”

In point of fact, these sorts of suggestions, in which we are awash (a-green-wash), do not constitute a level of ‘savings’ that can—even combined with other ‘little bits’—ever add up to a significant amount (and even that small amount ignores the Jevons paradox, which tells us that efficiency gains often lead, counter-intuitively, to an increase in consumption), simply because of the sheer size of the challenges that confront us.

Credible sources estimate that, in order to achieve the goal of 350 ppm for CO2 (or CO2e), those of us who live in the US need to reduce our per capita energy usage by something like 80% – 90%, to effectively wean ourselves completely off of finite, non-renewable fossil fuel energy, the burning of which lies at the heart of every single one of the problems listed above.

According to James Hansen and other climate scientists, we need to do this over a very short period of time if we hope to avoid an ice-free earth leading to a catastrophic sea level rise.

And of course, that’s just for the climate challenge piece. Additional efforts are going to be needed to properly steward water and soil, to stop habitat destruction and consequent ecosystem and biodiversity loss and desertification, to fundamentally restructure a wildly out of whack food production system, etc.

These efforts will, per force, need to occur within the context of vastly diminished access to fossil fuels and the tools with which they provide us. In short, because the systems in question are complex, what we face are not ‘problems’ but ‘predicaments’:

 “Most of the so-called intractable problems we are now facing (e.g. …the growing economic, energy and ecological crises) are not ‘problems’ at all, but complex predicaments. The challenges of complex systems are predicaments, not problems, because, since they are not mechanical, they cannot be ‘fixed’ or ‘solved’. Alternative, non-mechanistic approaches must be used to deal with them.” ~ Dave Pollard

‘Daunting’ is an understatement. Let’s put it this way: we’re running flat out at 100 mph and heading for a cliff. If we all do a ‘little bit,’ then perhaps we’ll only be doing 90 by the time we reach that cliff. Perhaps, if we accept a little more pain, only 80. Obviously, this isn’t good enough.

photo by Jill Barth

Instead of ‘hybrid’ think ‘bicycle’ or ‘walking.’ Instead of ‘compact fluorescent’ think ‘skylight.’ Instead of ‘cool to 76 degrees’ think ‘no air conditioning’ and instead of ‘heat to 68 degrees’ think ‘wood and wool.’ Instead of ‘Whole Foods’, think ‘CSA’ or ‘backyard garden.’ I could go on, but you get the point.

That point derives from the fact that we have allowed ourselves to be misled into thinking that we can make relatively painless, small sacrifices and that these will be magically transformed into large and significant outcomes. In a way, this is even worse than doing nothing, because doing many small things—many ‘little bits’—encourages us to feel we’ve done our part—and thus reduces the pressure we rightly feel to do the big things.

I would further argue that we have allowed ourselves to be misled into thinking that ‘the government’ needs to figure this out (if only we can get the right set of rascals in there!) instead of implementing major changes in our lifestyles even in the absence of the ‘right’ policies being put into place beforehand. So we’ve fallen into the trap of thinking ‘I am only one person—or one family—I’ll do the little bits and rely on government to do the big bits.’

But if we can conclude nothing else from the pronounced paucity of action on the part of the government across 50 years of increasingly escalating warnings about ongoing ecological degradation (even now with the cliff in sight!) we most assuredly can conclude that government cannot be relied upon—hoped and prayed for perhaps, but not relied upon—to get the ‘big bits’ right.

It is only reasonable, then, to conclude that it is almost certainly going to fall upon our shoulders, the shoulders of individuals, families, neighborhoods and communities, to handle not just the little bits but the big bits as well.

Contemplating this ‘inconvenient truth,’ I won’t insult you by offering blindly optimistic handwaving (“we can do it!”) let alone any guarantees. What I will offer you is a reminder—a ‘big bit’ of wisdom from Buddhist monk and alleged ‘happiest man in the world’ Matthieu Ricard:

“The basic root of happiness lies in our minds; outer circumstances are nothing more than adverse or unfavorable.”



Formally trained, and with degrees, in physics and engineering, Oz is a dedicated yogi and Vipassana meditator whose passion and focus is ecological sustainability, and finding genuinely green ways to address the daunting environmental challenges we face in these thoroughly unsustainable and greenwashed times.




Editors: Jill Barth / Andrea B. 


~Like elephant green on Facebook.~


About elephant journal

elephant journal is dedicated to "bringing together those working (and playing) to create enlightened society." We're about anything that helps us to live a good life that's also good for others, and our planet. >>> Founded as a print magazine in 2002, we went national in 2005 and then (because mainstream magazine distribution is wildly inefficient from an eco-responsible point of view) transitioned online in 2009. >>> elephant's been named to 30 top new media lists, and was voted #1 in the US on twitter's Shorty Awards for #green content...two years running. >>> Get involved: > Subscribe to our free Best of the Week e-newsletter. > Follow us on Twitter. Fan us on Facebook. > Write: send article or query. > Advertise. > Pay for what you read, help indie journalism survive and thrive—and get your name/business/fave non-profit on every page of elephantjournal.com. Questions? Send to [email protected]


8 Responses to “Every Little Bit Helps…or Does it? ~ Oz Osborn”

  1. Bravo. I worry (a lot) about those who are not part of the choir and are overwhelmed enough to think, why bother doing anything. Is there something to be said about inspiring small changes to start, creating a habit and then moving on to larger scale efforts? Or maybe that was the answer 20, 30 years ago. What a conundrum! I think people also have to think in terms of being active in trying to help make change to policy via organizations like 350.org and their seemingly effective petitions that have at least stalled things like the Tar Sands pipeline. Great perspective on our current situation!

  2. oz_ says:

    A conundrum indeed Lynn – and thanks for the thoughtful comment. It's certainly preferable for people to be doing *something* rather than nothing – a vehicle approaching a cliff at 80 mph will, after all, be easier to stop than one traveling at 100!

    The real conundrum arises when we realize that no matter how large the changes each of us makes individually, it will still likely prove grossly insufficient. As Derrick Jensen has pointed out, municipal waste – that includes both residential waste and local government and business – this is the stuff put out on the curb to be picked up by your friendly neighborhood waste removal service – constitutes only 3% of the total waste stream. So if you and I and everyone else somehow magically stop all contributions to the waste stream at our homes and offices – AND we convince local governments and businesses to do so as well – it still barely puts a dent in the problem.

    The big changes needed are systemic in nature. So all of us must be prepared not just to simplify and do 'our part' including the big bits – but also to support a radical reconfiguration of the systems upon which we depend – transport, agriculture, commerce/IT, utilities, telecommunications, residential, financial, etc.

    To the degree that we can reduce our dependency on those systems and the *throughput* demand on them, by measures such as those suggested above, we create space in which those systems *can* be changed. For example, if we all continue demanding non-stop AC during the summer, then there's no way the grid can be reconfigured to a more sustainable version of itself – one that uses considerably less fossil fuels to generate considerably less electricity. Just an example, and of course, even if we all engage in Herculean efforts to create that kind of space, there is no guarantee that the multinationals that operate those systems – and profit handsomely from the status quo – will take advantage of it. But that remains a moot point for so long as we continue to buy into the consumerist/comfort/convenience paradigm that keeps those systems humming. As long as that remains true, the burden falls, IMO, on us as individuals to change in order that we may then force the larger changes. It must start, I fear, with us.

  3. The question is … how do we motivate the world to move away from the consumerist/convenience lifestyle? That cliff better be far away. Or we're in for one heck of a ride. Look forward to more of your writing and learning more about your work.

  4. Jill Barth says:

    I posted this to the elephant green Facebook page. Thanks for sharing!

    Jill Barth, Green Editor
    Join us! Like elephant green on Facebook

  5. Lorin says:

    Just posted to "Featured Today" on the brand new Elephant Food Homepage.

    Lorin Arnold
    Blogger at The VeganAsana
    Please "like" Elephant Food on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

  6. I precisely required to appreciate you once more. I am not confident the things that I may have used without the type of concepts revealed by you regarding this topic matter. It truly was a hard case in my circumstances, nonetheless , obtaining out the expert strategy you handled that took me to jump over joy. I’m just pleased for this assistance and then hope that you truly know what an remarkable job you might be carrying out educating the rest with the aid of your webpage. I am certain you’ve got never come across any of us.

  7. […] as Earth Day approaches and the conversation rolls on about our delicate eco-system and whether or not the little steps are getting us anywhere, I say take ‘em anyway. Baby steps may not save the planet, but they may be just the first […]