4.8 Editor's Pick
March 20, 2018

Alo, do the right thing—and we will all thank you. ~ Kino MacGregor

My personal hope is that the two “sides” can talk this out sans lawyers, and find a point of consensus that is truly a win for all.

In the meantime, a reminder that hate, trolling, bullying is not helpful for one’s own cause. Constructive criticism—the ability to agreeably disagree, with an open mind and heart, to listen—is what our community, and our world need more of.

While this all may seem like drama—and there is some of that—there are important issues and questions for our yoga community here. Capitalism, transparency, bullying by fans, the theistic notion of “fan” and fame itself replacing community, litigation against individuals instead of dialogue. 

So, please, support mindful, open dialogue on platforms not controlled by Facebook or other quarterly-return-focused enterprises. Support independent, mindful forums that encourage talk, and listening—and may we all work together to encourage peace, and discourage litigation.

And, when in doubt, come back to the practice. The practice teaches us to breathe through the difficult times, such as this. Not to avoid. Not to make worse with our own aggression. May it be of benefit!
~ Waylon, ed.

Note: here’s Kino’s first article. Here’s Paul’s response. Here’s Kino’s thoughtful rejoinder.

I’ve told their ambassadors that I wish them and Alo no harm.

Truly, I want them all to succeed.

I’d love nothing more than to write a glowing blog about how awesome Alo is to change their ways. 

To everyone who read my prior article and the rebuttal, thank you. Thank you for taking the time to digest the information and make an informed decision. Before you tire of this matter, I ask that you please consider my rebuttal, which is intended to answer—or at least raise—many of the questions and comments you have posed on social media and will paint a more complete picture. Here it is:

Despite a massive public outpouring, Alo persists in its lawsuits against Dana. They have not waivered, even when faced with an uproar from its own customer base. So again, I ask, Alo: what is your position? Are you hoping that this will blow over and people will tire of the drama and move on?

Make no mistake, I am deeply disappointed by the detailed and personal attack levied against me by Paul, former owner of Cody (which he continues to run, post-acquisition of Cody by Alo). I took great pains in my article to be fair and I refrained from divulging much information that would have cast Cody in a negative light out of respect for Paul and the relationship I had with him in the past and because I am contractually bound to confidentiality. But the Paul I knew was a kind and decent human being, not the person who levied misleading attacks, and certainly not someone who would have sued Dana.

I want so badly to respond to the allegations concerning my contract and my business relationship with Cody and Alo, but I am legally bound by a unilateral confidentiality clause which means that they can share whatever details they want—but if I share any details they have grounds to file a lawsuit against me!

So, Alo, will you please allow a full and fair dialogue on these issues by releasing me from the one-way confidentiality provision in my contract and permitting me to respond in full to the accusations against me? You’ve said your piece in this public forum; now let me say mine. Your refusal to do so can only lead this mindful community to assume that you, in fact, do not want the truth to come out.

The picture painted of me is hurtful, tarnishing my good name in the yoga world. Don’t I at least deserve the right to respond honestly and state the facts without yet another impending lawsuit?

There are also dog whistles to misogyny that were so subtle you might have missed it in Cody’s response [Alo still has not responded as to whether they are willing to drop their lawsuits]. But I did not. Calling me a “shrewd” business woman brings up unhappy memories of the last U.S. election cycle. Attack a woman for her success. Portray yourself as the humble hero who is victimized by her conniving, malicious ways.

Perhaps you meant a “smart” or “savvy” business woman. Yes, I’m sure that’s what you meant.

Am I involved, both personally and professionally? Yes. It’s not a secret. Read my article and you’ll see an upfront “personal and full disclosure” where I talk about my own potentially selfish motivations.

Call me what you want. Nevertheless I will persist. Attacking the woman who brings up the claim and changing the subject is an all too familiar tactic. It wreaks of guilt, patriarchy and aggression. And I will not stand down or apologize for who I am.

I am brave and entrepreneurial. I am a respected and well-known yoga teacher. I am an author of multiple books. I have spent two plus decades honing my craft, building this reputation, affecting my students on a one-to-one basis, and forming who I have become as a person.

But this isn’t about me. And this isn’t about Paul.

This is about one thing—

Alo Yoga is suing Dana.

Goliath is attacking David.

All this drama and mud-slinging could go away with one action: Alo Yoga drops the lawsuits against Dana and lets us go. Dana has been self-funding and trying to fight this on her own for four months, because she never wanted people to be distracted by something as unproductive as litigation. Dana has tried repeatedly to settle this litigation. She has tried everything she can think of, and you are, so far, just watching her squirm.

Dana Falsetti is being sued in two courts—one in California and one in Washington, and each resulting from one Instagram Story that was on the internet for a few hours—filed by a yoga company run by two men as part of their billion-dollar corporate conglomerate. They are seeking unspecified damages and the cost of the attorneys’ fees that Alo is spending to sue her. Dana, the target of these lawsuits, is a 24-year-old yoga teacher and social issues advocate; she started working with Cody right out of college. Many of her activities, including her podcast (which has been in the works for a year) and her labor to educate and raise awareness are not revenue-generating. She cannot afford this. These lawsuits may bankrupt her, even if she prevails on most of the issues. And for what? Is this worth draining Dana of resources that could otherwise be used to do her important and positive work in the world?

She is being used by Alo Yoga to set an example: do not speak out.

That is just not okay.

And they are trying to silence others, too.

When Alo filed these lawsuits against Dana, they also sued ten other unnamed (and so far unidentified) yogis. Alo has not explained how these yogis allegedly defamed it or breached Dana’s contract. Who else among us will also be named by Alo as a defendant for failing to fall in line, before all is said and done?

To donate to Dana’s legal fund, here. “If there are any amounts remaining after the lawsuits conclude or if the lawsuit gets dropped (which we earnestly hope it will), then we will donate those amounts to The Campaign for Equal Justice.”

I’ve caught some flack for listing Alo Yoga’s paid ambassadors. People have asked me to please leave them out of it because they are innocent by-standers. To the Alo Ambassadors, please understand that I could not contact each one of you directly before posting my article. It must be awful to wake up to the reality that the company that pays your bills isn’t as good and pure as you thought. That said, I leave room for Alo to change their ways, and then for our community to embrace that change.

There is, however, no place for my friends or community, or those on the other “side,” to bully. I, myself and others are now also being attacked by the Instagram/Facebook fans. I have personally received threats that make me afraid for my human safety.

Yet, while I am truly sorry for the hateful comments and I do not condone any type of bullying, I must draw attention to the word “ambassador” as justification for including your names in my original blog. Just for reference I’ve included the definition at the bottom of this article.

Once you sign on to be a paid representative of a country, brand or any other organization you are holding yourself out as standard bearer of said organization. Your values and ethics must be in alignment with the way the company, country or organization is run or else you could not be send out as an “ambassador.” Your job is to represent, answer for and be the face of the company, country or organization that hires you. Ambassadors who say that what Alo does in relation to their lawsuit against Dana has nothing to do with them should take pains to reflect on what their sponsored association with Alo truly means. To play the victim while Alo pays their bills and they deposit checks from said company…we can do better. Each ambassador of any company they represent should be held answerable for their sponsor’s actions…or else how can they be called an ambassador? There is no problem being paid by a company to be an ambassador, as long as we are transparent. But you must answer for the good and the bad of what you represent, and your names were listed in the spirit of asking the yoga community to ask you to relay a plea to drop the lawsuits to Alo—not to attack you personally.

And to the public: be kind to the ambassadors. They are feeling human beings as well, not corporate giants. Who knows, perhaps they are bound by one-sided contracts, scared of being sued, unable to speak out because of confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions.

It is the two men who own Alo who must answer for their actions. However, so far, they have chosen to remain silent and let their ambassadors take the heat.

My request is a firm, persistent call to do the right thing. No hate. In fact, if we can continue to talk, and listen…and pull away from suing…I think we have a happy ending in the works.





noun: ambassador; plural noun: ambassadors

         1          an accredited diplomat sent by a country as its official representative to a foreign country.”the French ambassador to Portugal”

         2          synonyms:

         3          envoy, plenipotentiary, emissary, (papal) nuncio, representative, high commissioner, consul, consul general, diplomat; archaiclegate “the American ambassador”

         4       ◦           a person who acts as a representative or promoter of a specified activity.”he is a good ambassador for the industry”

                  ◦           synonyms:

                  ◦ campaigner, representative, promoter, champion, supporter, backer, booster “a great ambassador for the sport”


Bonus: Kino talks with Waylon about Alo and Dana & the Path of Yoga in an Instagram culture.


Bonus round: videos with yogis to refresh the palate after a long day of yoga community.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Create an account.

Maeve Endsieg Ho Apr 2, 2018 12:43am

her eyebrows say it all.. she has bad eyebrows

Nicole Hagestad Mar 26, 2018 7:30pm

/These people seem super nice! I bet they are never, ever condescending or passive-aggressive in real life. I wouldn't hesitate to trust them in the workplace or a new neighborhood./

Cameron Burgess Mar 24, 2018 6:20am

Someone much wiser than me once said ‘you hurt the world as much when you take offense as when you give it’. ----------- Hi Kino, Let me start by saying that it’s clear that you care. Unfortunately, what comes across even more clearly, in both of your posts, and in your hour long interview with Waylon, is that you think that you’re right. And you’re not - not entirely. Clearly you are closer to this situation than any of the armchair observers. And clearly you have strong opinions about not only the situation, but Alo and Cody themselves. And clearly you have been, in your experience, adversely impacted by your intersections with both Codyapp, and Alo. And obviously you are a named party in the court proceedings. And still, your experience is subjective, and the mistake you’re making is stating something is ‘true’, when it’s not. I wish you would take the sword of your outrage to your own mind, and develop some deeper insight. Because I, for one, believe that you're trying to use your influence for good, and would like to see you do a much better job. The equivalencies you draw between MLK and Gandhi on the one hand, and the Nazis and systemic racism on the other (in your interview with Waylon), are completely out of place in this situation. This is two relatively privileged white women, squaring off against two even more privileged men. And 1800 children a day die from lack of access to clean drinking water, and you are pouring your heart and prodigious energy into this fight? This is what earns your outrage? Are you serious? So here is a list of what troubles me about THIS particular article: 1. “I’d love nothing more than to write a glowing blog about how awesome Alo is to change their ways.” - This opening statement is the clearest articulation of your righteousness. It presumes that you are holding the ‘right’ perspective, and Alo has the ‘wrong’. 2. “I am legally bound by a unilateral confidentiality clause …” - That you signed. Why? 3. “Calling me a “shrewd” business woman brings up unhappy memories of the last U.S. election cycle. Attack a woman for her success. Portray yourself as the humble hero who is victimized by her conniving, malicious ways.” - No. How you hear something is your responsibility. I didn’t read any negative connotation to the use of the word ‘shrewd’. In fact, I didn’t read anything misogynistic in that article at all. Further, as others have indicated, the closing sentence is exactly the narrative that you are perpetuating about both yourself, and Dana. 4. “Attacking the woman who brings up the claim and changing the subject is an all too familiar tactic. It wreaks of guilt, patriarchy and aggression” - So strongly disagreeing with you results in this counterclaim? No. Just no. In fact, it's one of my biggest issues here; you are doing exactly this, by saying this is being done! 5. “It must be awful to wake up to the reality that the company that pays your bills isn’t as good and pure as you thought.” - As good and pure as YOU thought they thought. This is another example of your righteousness (and you know you can edit these articles right? So if you really do care about the ambassadors, take their names out of the original article!) 6. Finally, you’ve responded to only one comment on either of these articles, seeming to indicate that for all your communication to the contrary, you’re not really interested in dialog yourself. Before closing it's important to stipulate that I largely agree with Angela Maguire's refutation of Paul Javid's post. Largely, but not entirely - because it supports a dominant narrative in the yoga community about business, and business people, and presumes, in so many ways, that yogis can do no wrong. I agree with SOME of what you’re saying (as I indicated in my previous response), but the way that you’re going about it lacks intellectual and behavioural integrity. You are conflating multiple issues, making generalisations based upon your own personal experience, and engaging in the very behaviours you are accusing others of. And what’s worse is that you’re being lobbed softballs by folks who agree with you, and attacked by those who don’t, but you’re not being held to account by your own community for one simple reason: Other than fundamentalists of all stripes I’ve met from the Wailing Wall, to the West Bank, and in churches and cathedrals all over the world, yogis are amongst the most self-righteous people I’ve ever met. And you are being self-righteous. Love doesn’t always mean being nice, setting boundaries, is entirely acceptable, calling others out on their lack of integrity and fighting for a better world are all worthy pursuits. But when you’re righteous about it, you lose. And so do we all. Peace Cameron

Erin Aylmer Mar 22, 2018 8:11pm

$$ for sure - I am curious if Dana asked for her help.

Marcus Tan Mar 22, 2018 12:27pm

It makes you think shrew because it sounds phonetically the same? That's a pretty weak argument for mysogynism let's be honest

Yar Pal Mar 22, 2018 5:51am

alo is suing 11 people who practice and teach yoga (which is what i assume "yogi" means), contributing to the ruination of the planet with its plastic product, and saying with millions of dollars and dozens of paid propagandists ("ambassadors") that yoga is clothes and performance, all and only to make millions more. paul javid wants us to believe macgregor is a manipulative, money-grubbing thief, and writes this knowing she cannot respond because man's law has made honest speech into an act of violence, all as his bosses try to ruin falsetti for her own honest paragraph. alo the mind-killer is built by hoarders to literally thrive on suffering, yet is fantasized in comments as victim!

Read Elephant’s Best Articles of the Week here.
Readers voted with your hearts, comments, views, and shares:
Click here to see which Writers & Issues Won.

Kino MacGregor

Kino MacGregor is an international yoga teacher, author of four books, producer of six Ashtanga Yoga DVDs, writer, vlogger, world traveler, co-founder of Miami Life Center, co-fouder of Yoga Challenge and OmStars. Kino’s dharma is to help people experience the limitless potential of the human spirit through the inner tradition of yoga. She is one of the few people in the world of yoga to embrace both the traditional teaching of India’s historic past and the popular contemporary social media channels. You can find her teaching classes and workshops all over the world and on Kino Yoga Instagram with over one million followers and on Kino Yoga YouTube channel with over 100 million views. With more than 17 years of experience in Ashtanga Yoga, she is one of a select group of people to receive the Certification to teach Ashtanga yoga by its founder Sri K. Pattabhi Jois in Mysore, India and practice into the Fifth Series of Ashtanga Yoga. Practice with Kino online at OmStars.