In the transcription of the interviews with John Perkins and Deepak Chopra—the repeated injection of the word “[laughter]”, particularly from the interviewer, conveys to me a sense of a “good ol’ boys” clubbiness that contradicts the import of the interviewee. In addition, the word is simply distracting; it tells us nothing about the subject or the interviewee. ~ Zigy Kaluzny.
I think your complaint might stem from the fact that the Perkins interview was live—and the crowd was doing most of the [Laughter]. When an interview is private, there’s less overt fun. In any case, the tradition of noting when interviewer, interviewee or audience laughs is taken from Vajradhatu’s Hinayana, Mahayana and Vajrayana Seminary Transcripts that I and other Shambhala Buddhists grew up studying. I think you’re right—it can be distracting—but if folks laugh, we note it. It’s a form of communication—and a welcome reminder that changing the world needn’t be a solemn thing. ~ed.
hot on elephant
A letter to the Anger that refuses to Leave Me. 1,359 share Learn to Rock your Social Media & Write Mindfully with Waylon Lewis & Elephant’s Editors. 5 shares 2017’s First Full Moon in Cancer: Everything we Want is on the Other Side of Fear. 22,475 shares Why I Snort Raw Cacao. 8,905 shares The Best Marriage Advice from a Divorced Woman. 1,940 share If you Love her, Don’t Destroy Her. 6,076 shares The True Meaning of Friday the 13th (isn’t what we think). 5,202 shares The Power of Saying “He’s just Not into Me.” 1,752 share How to Disentangle ourselves from Karmic Relationships that Drive us Crazy. 133 shares You’ve Ruined Me for Anyone Else. 1,690 share