Why the Ideal “Alpha Male” is a Fallacy.

0

The Elephant Ecosystem

Every time you read, share, comment or heart you help an article improve its Rating—which helps Readers see important issues & writers win $$$ from Elephant. Learn more.

Views 1.0
Shares 5.5
Hearts 1.1
Comments 8.7
Editor's Pick 0.0
Total Ecosystem Rating 1.6
1 Do you love this article? Show the author your support by hearting.
1
468

In many cases in nature, it is not the strongest males who become the most successful.

And in line with this, the ideal that many of us believe we should naturally live up to is often one that is slightly unachievable.

The idolization of the “alpha male” is a part of our cultural conditioning and, from what studies of the natural world disclose, it is proven incorrect.

I was sitting with a man last week who told me how the pressure he felt to be the dominant person in every scenario was overwhelming. He said he felt regular anxiety and isolation because of this.

This was not the first time I had heard a man tell me about the weight of living inside of this type of pressure, and it hit me as something that needed to be questioned. I have grown to understand, in my own life, the importance of being able to transverse between force and ease—acting powerfully and also opening gently—and I have seen success with this with my counseling and coaching clients, too.

In dealing with others and the world, the ability to surrender and also to lead yields more productive and healthy outcomes than relating in a static manner of just one way or the other.

We have traditionally believed—and still do (even if these days we only whisper it in secret)—that there is a place of power that men should hold or always be striving toward. However, this “ideal” place we have agreed upon as an ulterior motive is a lie.

(On a sidenote, we have also held onto the idea that women should primarily be yielding.)

I say this with the utmost respect, acknowledging that there are those who are evolving past these constructs. However, the majority of us are holding onto the ideal of the “alpha male”—even those of us who pretend not to.

When I am feeling tired, in a teeny part of my heart, I grasp at a fantasy of a person in my life who might take charge regularly, decide all the “big” decisions for me, pave the way, and provide my basic needs for protection—always. But, I realize that this sounds uncannily like the description of a god. Does it not?

Have we, as a culture, unwittingly created a new religion—one in which men are meant to be gods?

That’s a lot of pressure!

Let’s question who this man is that should be the boss consistently? Is he the same man that can come home and caress his children and be touched gently by his partner? If yes, how does that transition happen?

Can the tough “alpha” talk sweetly and passionately when he desires? No, an “alpha,” by description, must be dominant consistently.

I’m drawn to nature regularly, and it teaches me many things. One thing I know from observing and studying the natural world, is that the sovereignty of the “alpha male” is a fallacy. Many females in nature dominate. Females are often the ones who control mating decisions, who choose the nest, who have multiple partners, and who work outside of the home.

There are certain animal tribes, like the bonobos residing in the Congo, in which the females dominate to reduce male aggression. And then there are the groups of octopi, killer whales, spotted hyenas, and honeybees in which the females assume the “alpha” role simply because it makes sense in their systems.

It’s curious that as human animals, we have historically decided to see women as needing an “alpha” in order to survive.

Another interesting question is: do human women need an alpha male? Or is it men who feel they need to live up to their male peers and societal ideals that keep this falsehood going?

Maybe I’m different, but I don’t think that encouraging one way of being will help us evolve into happier and healthier individuals. It is in the ability to be dynamic people, feeling and expressing the many sides of our humanness that we find our peace and harmony. In the Buddhist lineage I study, we call this “the middle way.”

Many people want a partner who can hold their own, who can make decisions, and who can support us when we’re down. But, this does not mean we search for an “alpha.” This actually means we want to partner with an adult.

Desiring to be with an adult means that we become one ourselves, and we learn to take turns playing these different roles. We realize (as nature demonstrates) to move through the world in the best way possible, we must be a mixture of things.

Successful people are also gentle, soft spoken, flexible, and kind.

I’m certain—and have done my groundwork on this one—that the ideal man is not primarily dominant, just like the ideal women is not primarily submissive. It’s a myth to hold onto these limiting perceptions. What is appropriate, though, is understanding a new label for us. Perhaps we will call ourselves “equals” instead?

Let’s leave gods to their places. Let’s allow people, instead, to be whole and real.

~

Author: Sarah Norrad
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Editor: Leah Sugerman
Copy Editor: Travis May
Social Editor: Waylon Lewis

0

The Elephant Ecosystem

Every time you read, share, comment or heart you help an article improve its Rating—which helps Readers see important issues & writers win $$$ from Elephant. Learn more.

Views 1.0
Shares 5.5
Hearts 1.1
Comments 8.7
Editor's Pick 0.0
Total Ecosystem Rating 1.6
1 Do you love this article? Show the author your support by hearting.
1
468

Read The Best Articles of November
You voted with your hearts, comments, views, and shares.
CLICK TO SEE WHO WON

Sarah Norrad

Sarah Norrad was born a wild woman in the rural and rugged forests of the Nimpkish Valley, on Vancouver Island, BC. This is a place where the mountains, forests and rivers speak louder than the people. A transformational coach, certified yoga instructor, mindfulness and lay counsellor, and authoress, Sarah muses at the world through a lens steeped in mindfulness, adventure, and tenderness. Currently, she exploits the cracks in her own heart to write as a columnist at elephant journal, her busy brain to create content for others through her business and her keen spirit to sit as coach and counsellor, teaching powerful tools for success in all aspect of our lives, especially personal power. Please track down her offerings and her mindful self on elephant journal, her writer’s page or her personal Facebook, her website, Cowbird, Twitter and Instagram.

Lincoln Read Oct 18, 2017 5:08pm

Thank you for your thoughts Sarah, with which I agree completely. When we say 'historically' in reference to the alpha male, I'm reminded of a time when God was actually a Goddess. If you've read Clan of the Cave Bear and it's sequels by Jean M. Auel, you've seen the hypothesis in action. She did her research well and I would offer two titles as proof: "When God was a Woman" by Merlin Stone, and "The Great Goddess" by Jean Markale. The short story is that since everybody liked sex and saw animals doing it too, and since the gestation periods of all the complex animals were so long, nobody understood the connection. Since no one realized how babies got made, it was magic, and only women could do it, making them sacred. Thus, if the world was born at some point, as they assumed everything must be the creator must be a creatress - a goddess. Only after the pastoral revolution was it realized that keeping the rams away from the ewes meant no babies. Then of course we went overboard and said the woman was the field, the man the all-important seed, etc. Be that as it may, my point is that the creator was a woman long before he/she/it was thought of as a man. That change is a long and nasty story partly chronicled in the Old Testament if you know what to look for, as well as other sacred books. The alpha male is therefore a relatively new 'historic' thought pattern, mostly based on non-science, and I have a feeling is a fairly silly, made-up ego trip we might do well to get rid of - a sort of reverse Freudian penis envy. I could go on and on but I do agree wholeheartedly that men don't need to always be dominant, always the wise decision maker or responsibility taker. Nobody can always do everything on their own. I think the more balanced God/Goddess viewpoint of Yin/Yang as inseparable opposites also existing within one another is a healthier and more realistic pattern. We need each other! Sorry for the rant and thanks for your article! L