We’ve done mentions on this before, back in our paperful days—did you know Google agrees to censor results on ‘Tiannamen,’ ‘Tibet,’ ‘Dalai Lama,’ even ‘freedom‘ and ‘independence‘ in China? It doesn’t stop there. Today’s NY Times goes into depth on the difficult, un-American balancing act Google ‘has to’ do, from a business point of view, to get itself allowed in various countries. Excerpt:
Voluntary self-regulation means that, for the foreseeable future, Wong and her colleagues will continue to exercise extraordinary power over global speech online. Which raises a perennial but increasingly urgent question: Can we trust a corporation to be good — even a corporation whose informal motto is “Don’t be evil”?
hot on elephant
Elephant Journal’s Holiday Gift Guide 636 shares A letter to the Anger that refuses to Leave Me. 569 shares Waylon’s favorite Ethical Gifts. 13 shares Join: Elephant’s Winter 2017 Academy. 28 shares Trevor Noah just won my Respect. 2,560 shares Year of the Fire Rooster 2017: What to Expect. 906 shares December Forecast: Letting Go of 2016 & Leaning into 2017 with Love. 7,128 shares The Real Reason so many Long-term Relationships Fail Sexually. 708 shares Why a Year of No Dating was the Best Thing I ever did for Myself. 6,118 shares These Tweets (and Retweets) actually Happened. 1,387 share