The Dalai Lama Redefines Religion with just 29 Words.

Via on Nov 14, 2011

It is hard to imagine a more powerful use of 29 words.

However, the Dalai Lama also owns the record for the most effective use of 66 words. Click here to read.



Elephant Spirituality is now on twitter… Click here to follow us!

Elephant Spirituality is an example of Elephant Journal’s commitment to the Mindful Life. We look to provide a fresh and practical perspective on traditional spirituality. If you would like to follow Elephant Spirituality on FaceBook click here and become a fan of Elephant Spirituality by clicking the “Like” tab at the top of the page.

About Benjamin Riggs

Ben Riggs is the director of the Refuge Meditation Group in Shreveport, LA. Ben writes extensively about Buddhist & Christian spirituality for The Good Men Project, Elephant Journal, and The Web of Enlightenment. To keep up with all of his work follow him on Facebook or Twitter. Looking for a real bio? Click here to read my story....


Loved it? Leave a tip!

(We use super-secure PayPal - but don't worry - you don't need an account with PayPal.)

14 Responses to “The Dalai Lama Redefines Religion with just 29 Words.”

  1. So simple, yet so perfect!

  2. yoga-adan says:

    brain "and" heart, and with kindness, yes ;-)

  3. Tanya Lee Markul Tanya Lee Markul says:

    Just posted to "Popular Lately" on the Elephant Yoga homepage.

  4. Tanya Lee Markul Tanya Lee Markul says:

    Thank you for sharing, dear Ben.

    Posting to Elephant Yoga on Facebook and Twitter.

    Tanya Lee Markul, Yoga Editor
    Join us! Like Elephant Yoga on Facebook
    Follow on Twitter

  5. guest says:

    sounds good. we just have to remember that our brain cheats. Don't believe everything you think makes sense.

  6. Joe Mohr says:

    Great share.
    To put it in haiku form:
    No need for temples.
    Our hearts and brains are temples.
    Simply share kindness.

  7. RoguePriest says:

    I like the sentiment, but he is a leader of a religion with thousands of temples and centuries of complicated philosophy. Somehow it seems a little disingenuous.

    • Lori says:

      I have to agree with you somewhat, in that I understand how certain "structures" support "dynamic activity". It cannot all be "dynamic activity" because then you end up with chaos. Furthermore, "structures" come in different forms, both physical and administrative or disciplinary. Without some structure there can be no support for growth. At the same time, too much structure can also become a growth inhibitor. There has to be a proper balance and that is not always easy to maintain.

  8. karlsaliter says:

    Well, see, he is a genuine leader. We are not used to those.

  9. Lori says:

    The only problem with relying only on your own "heart" and "brain" – especially the brain – is that there is, ultimately, no real Accountability. That is where the Spiritual Master and the community of practitioners come into play and serve a critical purpose if they are functioning effectively. The ego will persist in "self-guruing" if there is no profound surrender to the Spiritual Master and Spiritual Community and some acceptance of outside authority to hold one accountable for all of the "games" one tends to play to avoid relationship, to avoid real self-surrender and self-transcendence.

    • Ozz says:

      You are your own teacher. Looking for teachers can‘t solve your own doubts. Investigate yourself to find the truth – inside, not outside. Knowing yourself is most important.
      – Ajahn Chah

      Worth thinking (deeply) about IMO.

  10. Ozz says:

    I agree with the DL – the problem is, this is preaching to the choir.

    Question is – how does one get this message across to those who need most to hear it? A story I first heard from Jack Kornfield recalled a young woman who had become a Buddhist, which caused some conflict with her family. She reflected that while her family didn't like that she was a Buddhist – they loved it when she was a Buddha.

    In other words, ya gotta walk the talk.

    For example, how kind are we when interacting with, say, members of the Religious Right? Or for that matter with people who simply disagree with us or rub us the wrong way?

    Hopefully, quotes like this one come to mind when we find ourselves in those places where kindness is simultaneously hardest to practice and most necessary.

Leave a Reply