Not All Men Fantasize About Being a Clueless Baby Man with a Hot Wife. Rebuttal to “The Spiritual Dos & Don’ts of Being with a Woman.”

Via on Nov 12, 2012

retro housewife with husband

I recently read the elephant journal article “Spiritual Dos and Don’ts of Dating a Woman” and it left me with that squidginess in my gut I like to call the No Feeling.

I’m not going to deny that women should be treated well in relationships, and yes, it is undeniably inappropriate to pull your dick out after giving a woman a bodywork treatment. I’m just not sure that starting from that place is really the best way for us to talk about evolving as a human species.

For too long, women have been stereotyped as long-suffering Goddesses who must be worshiped and cared for and given constant orgasms for all the work we’ve done over the centuries while men have been running around having all the fun. Are women really so one-dimensional that they must be treated as a super-species entity that has no flaws and no spiritual work to do?

You can take it from a woman who has made her share of really stupid relationship mistakes, many times, on the path of her spiritual growth. I have tried to trade sex for intimacy, I have cried and begged at the feet of men who made me feel like emotions were the silliest things to indulge in (yup, just like my dad), and I’ve pulled away from kind, affectionate men because I thought emotions were the silliest things to indulge in (really, I’m a lot like my dad). I’ve made myself out to be the victim, I’ve cried out at the universe for making men such stupid, cruel creatures. As long as it’s all men’s fault, I’m absolved of responsibility, so I don’t have to evolve.

Then I realized that hey, actually, I was the one making those choices. I’m the one that has told the stories about those relationships, and the only one who can do better by me is me.

I used to take a resentful pleasure in seeing men being stereotyped as simians with their brains located in their “dicks.” Now, though, I realize that those stereotypes are all about keeping both men and women from feeling like there’s no way we can be better than the boxes we’ve been put in. We are all participating in a culture that wants us to feel powerless.

Take, for example, the movie Knocked Up. Star Katherine Heigl infamously commented at the time:

It paints the women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints the men as lovable, goofy, fun-loving guys. It exaggerated the characters, and I had a hard time with it, on some days. I’m playing such a bitch; why is she being such a killjoy? Why is this how you’re portraying women?

Heigl got in big trouble for saying this, and fair enough, it’s not super profesh to speak badly about a movie you are starring in, but she was right, and not only about the negative portrayal of women. Men are badly stereotyped in this movie as well.

Knocked Up is a great example of archetypes we are virtually soaked in. Most sitcoms about “everyday life” portray beautiful, intelligent women married to an immature caveman of a husband. Always hilarious to watch that real-life scenario, right? We’re talking The Flintstones, the Simpsons, King of Queens, Family Guy, According to Jim and a bunch of others I found out exist that I’ve never heard of.

Slate.com has an article on this perpetual archetype, and suggests that these sitcoms may not be appealing only to male desire. Perhaps the ultimate male fantasy is not seeing yourself as a clueless baby man with a hot wife, after all. Matt Feeney writes:

The war of the sexes has shifted from the workplace back to the household and the bedroom. In portraying husbands as lousy parents, marginal breadwinners, and repellant sexual partners, the fat-husband sitcoms convey a persecution fantasy that rises from the same swamp of resentments as these books [including The Bitch in the House] do: “Yes, I’m supercompetent and I even look great, despite all the crap I have to deal with, and, yes, that’s my husband over there, the fat, useless one scratching his nuts.”

We like to think, as yogis, that we are somehow above the stereotypes we see on prime-time TV, that we are somehow higher on our spiritual paths, and have thus figured out all the issues we have with our own gender and that of the perpetual other.

The truth is, the best we can be doing is working on it, and humbling ourselves to our participation in the mythologies, baggage and stereotypes that will arise when trying to negotiate any human relationship.

I remember, after a particularly exhausting breakup, I thought: “my god, I am so tired of learning from all the breakups. I would like to be done learning and just have a nice relationship please.” That was certainly wishful thinking—the learning is never done, especially if you are lucky enough to find a person who’s willing to do the work with you.

I did get lucky there: I’m with someone now who is affectionate, intelligent, mature, kind and loving. It’s not perfect: I still have the urge to push him away. I still expect him to abandon me. I still put him down sometimes so he fits into the stupid/cruel/immature/dick-centric box we’ve thrown men into for so long it’s become an impulse. He has his baggage too.

The difference is that we talk about it. We apologize, we work on it, we fight, we make up and we both get better at this. The truth is, we all live in a world that is saturated by stereotypes, and it takes a lot of consciousness and courage to break yourself out of these boxes and stop stuffing yourself back in.

So let’s be a little more careful about how we talk about each other, and especially when we start telling each other what to do. You are the only one that can do your work, but we still need each other to be open, intelligent, compassionate, accepting, and yes, sometimes critical, but with the kind of humility that helps us work together, instead of all alone in these cramped little boxes.

~

Ed: Kate Bartolotta

Like equal rights for all on Facebook.

About Julie JC Peters

Julie (JC) Peters has been practicing yoga on and off from the tender age of 12, and it has gotten her through everything from the horrors of teenagedom to a Master’s degree in Canadian Poetry. She is a yoga teacher, spoken word poet, and writer, and teaches workshops on yoga and writing called Creative Flow. Julie also owns East Side Yoga in Vancouver with her mom, Jane.

3,048 views

Appreciate this article? Support indie media!

(We use super-secure PayPal - but don't worry - you don't need an account with PayPal.)

14 Responses to “Not All Men Fantasize About Being a Clueless Baby Man with a Hot Wife. Rebuttal to “The Spiritual Dos & Don’ts of Being with a Woman.””

  1. Thank you and Amen. It's time to help each other let go of this shit instead of continuing to perpetuate it.

  2. Mel says:

    Thank you! Two thumbs up! Nice rebuttal. Go Girl!

  3. Auki says:

    What your wrote sounds perfectly reasonable to me! :)

  4. Thanks for writing this Julie. Inclusive! Yes, it is all of us together in this experience we call being human. Both men and women need to take responsibility for their stuff. Working together to that end with a loving partner seems to me to the ultimate purpose of a relationship!

  5. MTmind says:

    that was lovely. as a man, I feel like adding on this:

    sometimes I want to be able to be the 'brain in the dick' beast. that IS a part of the masculine. it is by no means the whole of it, but it is best accepted as well. luckily I have a woman in my life who knows to enjoy all of me, a wonder which amazes me whenever I put my attention on it.

    peace

  6. Yes, sure, burst the stereotypes! All for it. But the piece that spawned this one was hilarious, I thought. This piece reads more like a research paper, fuddy-duddy and a bit dry. Sorry, I'm a sucker for whatever makes me laugh these days. Oh, and I did not appreciate the caveat in the final paragraph. Yikes. Careful language is a comedian's nightmare. We should be able to speak how we want to, no?

  7. Ditto. Every time I hear someone make a statement like "Don't be an asshole! Treat your woman like a goddess!" there seems to always be a counter reaction that says "Wait a minute! All men aren't assholes, and men need to be treated with respect just as much as women! Women's lib has ruined us all!" (ok i'm paraphrasing).

    By the same token, the comment "Don't be a bitch! Treat your man like a king!" often gets a similar reaction: "Women need attention too! I'm not giving him any more special treatment than I KNOW I deserve."

    Why the defensiveness? Can't both still be true, regardless of which one we happen to be pointing out? For every unseemly action Chloe listed for men, there's an (equally hilarious) counterpart for women. I think that's pretty obvious.

    And, her piece is meant to be funny. And, it does a pretty good job pointing out some of the annoying boundary crossing skeeziness present in the "conscious" community. I for one am glad this list exists and hope some boundary-crossers read it, because I also don't want to go to any tantric seminars on our first date.

  8. misslisted says:

    I was a little surprised when I read the other article. Haven't read much of her stuff, and don't want to be rude, but was glad to see this rebuttal posted. I thought it was a bit insulting, not just to men, but to women as well. I get it that it was meant to be funny, and I know there are a lot of men out there that treat women like crap and as sex objects and so on (just read my recent article here). But I am tired of stereotyping men and women and our relationships to one another. If it's done as a humor piece then please do something different than tired old cliches… It's not THAT black and white. I am surrounded by men that defy the kind of stereotype presented in the other article. Particularly my sons who are 20 and 12 and blow me away every day with their sensitivity and thoughtfulness as human beings…

  9. Mymble says:

    Great article. Talking of women like goddesses only serve to deepen the divide between the genders.

  10. Julian says:

    so refreshing to read this, especially from your perspective as a woman. its always so easy to think in stereotypes, and much more difficult to stop making ourselves into victims.

  11. [...] is a deep sadness when I witness a man that can’t recognize the emptiness he feels when he objectifies himself as a bank and truly believes he can buy love with things and status. It is painful to witness the [...]

  12. It paints the women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints the men as lovable, goofy, fun-loving guys. It exaggerated the characters, and I had a hard time with it, on some days. I’m playing such a bitch; why is she being such a killjoy? Why is this how you’re portraying women? Read more from Julie JC Peters »

Leave a Reply